

Gaslight, Obstruct, Project.


Gaslight, Obstruct, Project.


Eh, not necessarily. My dad became maga after his TBI. He was just a garden variety fiscal conservative before (because he’s a financial advisor).
But he’s also a diagnosed narcissist with an attachment disorder, so who knows


Except they’re successfully bullying millions of people.


Insects will eat plant waste that was already going to livestock.
Crops are graded after harvest. The first few grades are for human use, like 1 goes to stores, 2 gets canned or frozen, 3 gets processed into ingredients.
The last few grades are for animal feed, because the quality is too low.
So, no. It’s not food that humans would be using.


Insects actually have a way better food to growth ratio than cattle or poultry. You can produce more insects with less feed.


Add in potatoes and you have a balanced diet.


Late stage capitalism and far right extremism are on the rise there too.


No. It’s always just been rich people controlling things.
Hell, the revolutionary war was largely about the rich not wanting to pay taxes.
If they wanted a true democracy we wouldn’t have the EC.


It just takes one change.
If, within a year, you take out loans totaling more than some variable using assets as collateral, the assets are taxed as realized gains and the loan is taxed as income.
The variable would be some multiplier of the net take home pay of the lowest earners, say 50x the lowest 20% (~$1.6m). That way, if they want cheaper loans, people need to be paid more.
This has the added benefit of not applying to regular people doing stuff like equity loans.


For that to happen, the Senate has to vote to remove him.


Fetterman, probably


Impeachment is pointless. The question is whether the Senate will vote to remove him


Btw, Talarico’s shift in messaging is likely to counter ads from Maga Inc with clips of him saying that there’s 6 biological sexes, Jesus was a radical feminist, god is non binary, and he’s a christian who hates christianity.
It’s best to not pay too much attention to campaign messaging. They’ll say what they have to say to win, so looking at their past stances and voting history is a better metric. He’s trying to win a seat in Texas, afterall.


Because the bribes we know about aren’t all they get.


The people who like him are/like raging misogynistic rapists.


So what do you think the best course of action is?
The primaries have already happened. Nothing is going to change the candidates on the ballots unless someone drops out. As we’ve seen, this isn’t an issue that generates a big enough response for that.


The person I initially responded to said that the reason I was off by a factor of 1000 was because I forgot to multiply by the K in the price.
I said the actual reason I was off by 1000 was because when I glanced at the calculator I read the result wrong. The math was right, my reading comprehension wasn’t.
I was never arguing that the answer I put in the comment wasn’t wrong. I even edited it.


Apparently I’m not the only one making reading errors here.


No, it’s not. The numbers used to derive the answer were correct. I did not forget to multiply by the K. I read the answer wrong when I transferred it.
My math was correct, my reading wasn’t.
Friendly correction in case it wasn’t an autocorrect screw up, it’s keel over