Tabitha ☢️[she/her]

don’t worry it about to get real cool

they’ve had enough WWE style events in their lives, don’t make their funerals into one too.

this is kind of a weird one, because I think LLMs generally would natively recomend above average policies, but you know for a fact that the people currently in charge would train this specific LLM and feed it data and configure it’s memory/context/prompt are going to massage the inputs such that it’s essentially replacing “all the rich white guys decided to give Israel 999 billion dollars to Israel, sorry buddy, that’s democracy” to “sorry buddy, computer says, we gotta give 999 billion dollars to Israel”.

Just start a blog?

I usually stop thinking so the voices argue with each other instead of me

pole dancing

for example they’ll show you something like a video of Latino Americans celebrating with overlay text claim it’s Venezuelans supporting Trump (I’ll assume you don’t know Spanish or there’s no original audio) and it’s a real video but the original video was celebrating a sports game like 10 years ago.

I wouldn’t bother learning, whatever you learn today could be out of date in a year and could overall be impossible in less than 5 years. historically people would believe whatever title you slap on a youtube video regardless of if the video even tried to demonstrate the claim or not. I’d focus on authoritative and reliable sources and just be an open minded but also vigilant skeptic of claims you have no practical way to validate.

I think the more pertinent question would be: is the US willing to commit enough ground forces for such a thing? Imagine the political fallout of adding a 3rd mass casualty war to this list:

• Vietnam (58k dead, 300k wounded)
• Iraq (4.5k dead, 32k wounded)

for comparison, Iran is probably less than 20 dead, less than 500 wounded, and the US hasn’t committed ground troops, and is already an embarrassing failure.

Venezuela had an embarrassing moment but a high profile black ops kidnapping isn’t occupation.

removing ur ex from that one photo

it’s either fit for purpose or not fit for purpose. “finished” software can be a meaningless treadmill to nowhere.

It’s no different than going to sleep at night and waking up in the morning.

sorry to say this, but you should probably join some communities you perceive as inactive and hope they become more active collectively and/or over time.

/communities?listingType=All&sort=TopSixMonths&page=1

These days it just seems like you’re lucky if you’re receiving only one of: surveillance fascism, drone strikes.

I think the Earth is hollow and the USSR is hiding there.

might be too blurry lol

about the link specifically… I couldn’t identify what was wrong with the original version? Because I can think a lot of famously badly animated scenes, and the only problem I could see with the original scene is that they just stand around talking and doing nothing.

The AI version, while I did identify that a small number of shots were objectively better, I also noticed characters being replaced with a completely different art style and other random changes that imply a different authoral intent.

Also, the commenters in the thread did not seem to agree the new one was better. As tech experiment it’s not a bad comparison, but in terms of ways to blow $50, OP wasted their money, when literally anyone could tell you 5 anime scenes they wished were drawn better.

I think slop studios will use this for 90% of animations soon, and higher end studios might use future iteration of this to boost to 60fps and/or reduce the number of keyframes drawn by hand, which could in theory lead to a higher quality output at the same-or-reduced cost (with the same amount of labor, or in less time).