Something you’re just good at with minimal effort and/or you learned much more quickly than average.

For me, it’s paper snowflakes. My brain just seems to effortlessly figure out what cuts to make to the paper wedge to make it turn out exactly how I want it. Largely useless, but good fun and was a much-needed ego boost when I was a kid :]

  • Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’m great with mechanical puzzles. I apparently have a really good intuition about how things interact.

    I only know that I’m unique about it because of a military test my highschool made us take where I scored higher than 99% of people who took the test. I just thought it was the “easy” portion. I’m also pretty good at logic puzzles, but it definitely doesn’t feel as “natural” as mechanical puzzles.

    If you’re wondering, no, I didn’t go into engineering because it turns out I’m not really good at math.

    • spicy pancake@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      With math, is it arithmetic that gives you trouble or the actual symbolic manipulation of mathematics?

      I am hot garbage at keeping track of numbers but turn those fuckers into letters and (at least for me) it’s off to the races. Then I just convert everything back to numbers in the last step before jamming it all into a calculator. This method saved my ass in 400-level biochemistry courses. (Annoyed the shit out of the grad students grading my exams, I’m sure…)

      You may be better at “math” than you think :]

      • Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        I assure you, I’m really just not good at math. It just doesn’t click with me the same way physical systems do.

        Being bad at math was the short explanation; the long explanation is because pure math is super unintuitive to me, I got low grades in it throughout public school and therefore never pursued a college that would go into it heavily, even though I love the sciences. I ended up just going to my mom’s Alma Mater, which is a liberal art school and therefore didn’t have an engineering department. I actually did end up getting a computational physics degree because I loved my intro to physics class so much. When I could actually relate the formulae to physical systems, I was good. Did great in my upper level calculus classes, too, because I took them in parallel to the physics classes that directly used them. However, the more theoretical classes like linear algebra I barely passed and when it got to really complicated particle/quantum stuff I suffered greatly. Wave functions are a blight upon this world and my electricity and magnetism final made me cry.

        • spicy pancake@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Good on you for just casually getting a computational physics degree without inherent math talent… like holy shit that’s impressive!

          I have also cried over coursework on linear algebra as well as electricity and magnetism :') Brutal stuff.

      • Legolution@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Please could you explain a bit more about the process you describe, above? Maybe with some simple examples? I’m woeful at maths but really good with mechanical and physical problems. If there’s a way I can improve upon the former, I’d love to try.

        Thanks in advance!

    • Sickos [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Mechanical adept here too. I am very good at holding and manipulating 3d objects in my brain, so I can kinda always just tell how something goes together to work.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I lived in Canada for 6 months surviving on nothing but being a medical Guinea pig (I had no working permit and due to anonymity, very little was asked of people participating in medical trials, plus they paid a decent amount especially if pain or discomfort was involved); as part of this I went through a raft of IQ tests (there was always some gambling addiction trial going at UofT for some reason) and found out that, like you, I have exceptional visual intelligence - rotating objects in my head, and figuring out if something would fit together was super skills of mine. In every other way I’m decidedly average.

      • Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Wow we’re actually very different there. My visualization skills suck. Like, I’ve tried that thing where you imagine an apple in your head and rotate it, but I can’t even fully visualize a 2d apple. If I’m looking at a system though, I can just understand how it works without visualizing anything about it. Because of that, I did have to draw out some diagrams from the word problems on the aformentioned military test…

        Probably a major part to why I’m still not fully convinced I’m actually doing anything out of the ordinary. I’m not using any special skills or anything - the questions on that test felt to me about the same as asking “what would happen if you pushed this wheel from the top of this hill”.