• Fondots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t know if it’s so much a scam as it is banks and companies and such being stuck in the past.

      You could be getting paid every week or even every day, it’s your money, you already earned it, why should you have to wait for it?

      Especially in this day and age where everything is computerized. You punch in, you punch out, the computer knows how long you worked, somewhere in their payroll system they know how much you earned, what needs to be withheld, etc. It takes fractions of a second for a computer to do that math, they could send that transaction the moment you clock out.

      When things were more manual, it made sense, you had to have someone adding things up, and doing math, computers were bigger, slower, less user friendly, more expensive, and not all hooked up to the Internet up to the Internet to talk to each other. It used to make a lot of sense to do things in big batches at the end of the day, every week, every 2 weeks, 2 or 3 times a month, whatever.

      But now you could put in your 8 hours work, and walk out with your days wages already in your account ready to be used for whatever you need it for immediately, no more being broke until payday, payday is every day. But that’s not how it works because as far as the banks and such are concerned everything is working fine for them, so no real need to update their shit.

      • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Couldn’t this be switched around too? I’m only paying some of my bills every other month or twice a year. Why shouldn’t I be paying those off every week or even every day?

        • Fondots@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          It absolutely could, everyone manages their money in their own way. If that’s something that works for people I think they should have that option.

          Personally when possible, I do like to do things that way. If I owe, say, $100/month on my car payment, I will tend to pay $50 with each paycheck instead of $100 once a month, and if I got paid every week, I would probably choose to pay $25 a week instead. For me and how my brain is wired, it’s just easier for me to mentally keep track of things when they’re in smaller, more frequent increments. I don’t know if I would quite break it down to ~$5 a day if I got paid every day, but i’d consider it.

        • Karlos_Cantana@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Paying on your mortgage every week can drastically reduce your interest, depending on how your interest is calculated. Even if you pay the same amount at you would per month, paying it every week could save thousands of dollars.

    • Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      There’s next to no difference in regards to payroll processing on a week by week basis. Companies want to push this to a fortnight or month so it’s easier on their finances. There’s very little reason it couldn’t be paid weekly.

        • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          Technically every day you are not paid is an interest rate free loan to your employer. That said, being paid once a month is fine for me since all my fixed expenses are also paid on a monthly basis.

        • JWBananas@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          The employer basically gets an interest-free loan for that extra week; whereas the employee might need to pay interest to a third party to make up for any shortfall on their end (e.g. credit cards, payday loans). Majority of people live paycheck-to-paycheck and can’t cover an unexpected $1000 expense.

          • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            The interest-free loan part I get but I don’t see how getting paid every week would help you deal with the unexpected $1000 expense. To me this just sounds more like being bad at dealing with personal finances than anything granted I’m in a privileged place since I don’t live paycheck-to-paycheck

            • Fondots@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              It’s not going to help much with the unexpected $1000 expense, but it would help with the smaller expenses and general day-to-day life. If you’ve never had to utter the phrase “sorry, but I don’t get paid until next week” it’s probably hard for you to understand, but many of us had to miss out on some little things in life we needed or wanted because the money we had already earned wasn’t available to us when we needed it.

              • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                But you’re not getting any less money. If you can’t afford something when you’re getting paid once a month then you can’t afford it if you’re getting paid every day either.

                This still sounds more like an issue with managing personal finances than anything.