• FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes, just like lawyers work extra hard to get their opponent’s case dismissed.

    It’s an adversarial system. It depends on each side being hypervigilant about what their opponents are doing.

    • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m not disagreeing with you, but instead of worrying about “spoiler” votes, they could focus on having strong enough candidates that don’t need to fear third-party competition.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They can focus on both at the same time.

        In an election, every little advantage counts for the same reason that every vote counts.

        • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          2 months ago

          Maybe the margins wouldn’t be so thin if they had strong enough candidates though. Many people, myself included, vote based on who best matches our values.

          And for me, and many others, that’s a third party.

          • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            You’re assuming that only one side knows how to find strong candidates.

            If both sides have strong candidates, then you would expect thin margins. And “strong” doesn’t mean “maximally appeals to you”. It means “appeals, at least a little, to the maximum number of voters”.

            You can of course vote for whoever you want. But 30+ years ago third party candidates could get 5% or even 15% of the vote. Since 2000, a third party candidate has only gotten over 2% once (2016). That suggests major party candidates have gotten stronger over the years.

            • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              2 months ago

              But none of that means we all have to vote for the major candidates or vote out of fear of who MIGHT win.

              I am not concerned about “spoiling” any election. I vote for who I want, based on my values. And right now, that’s third party.

              • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Again, you are free to vote for whoever you want.

                But if you announce that you’re not concerned about a Trump victory, then the rest of us are free to judge you for it.

                • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  But if you announce that you’re not concerned about a Trump victory, then the rest of us are free to judge you for it.

                  Friend, I’ve been judged for voting third party ever since I joined Lemmy.

                  Honestly, many of the hateful remarks I’ve received have only strengthened my resolve that I’m doing the right thing by not voting for the Democratic Party.