• Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    But I don’t see how any of that has anything to do with this article or this thread. So I still don’t know what you are trying to say. You can assume my agenda and my lack of intelligence all day.

    Still doesn’t change the fact that I’m going to keep posting. Thanks, friend! :)

    • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t need to assume anything. You offer all the proof necessary with your pattern of behavior. Thanks, bud! Good luck with those resources I provided!

      • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        If I’m really such a troll, wouldn’t the best strategy be to stop engaging altogether? Every response just boosts the view count and engagement on my posts. If attention is supposedly what I crave, then ignoring me would be the quickest way to make me “go away,” right?

        Constant replies are actually feeding what you claim to hate, so maybe letting it fade into obscurity would be the logical move—if that’s really what you want.

        And if my trolling is so obvious, then you don’t have to worry about pointing it out, because as many have said, “every sees through” me. Right?

        I mean, the only problem with that scenario is that I’m not a troll. And I have posted articles that are critical of Trump, Stein, and Harris, as well as articles praising each of them.

        So the conflicting perspectives of stuff I post doesn’t really fit you narrative, but meh, just some room for thought I guess.

        • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          but meh, just some room for thought I guess

          It’s “food for thought” - are you sure you’re a native English speaker? You seem to have big problems with both idiom and reading comprehension.

          • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 month ago

            Meh, stubby fingers, tiny phone screen. But I’ll keep as is, cuz I like the idea of room for thought.

            What language do you think I’m native in, if not English? Are you trying to imply something?

            Come on, friend, you can say it out loud. Just say it…

            • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Hmm, not sure how stubby fingers get “food” to “room” - especially as we know from your frequent misspellings and constant editing of your previous posts, you obviously disabled auto-correct.

              And I didn’t imply anything, just asked a question as you seem to be constantly confused by common American English phrases - especially so for someone who is a native English speaker, and generally poor reading comprehension. “I don’t know what that means” is probably one of your five most common replies in comments.