• KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    People who are in an excited emotional state just aren’t going to do well thinking that stuff through.

    i suppose so, but it literally only takes one “is this actually true?” to check to see if it’s true. If people are as “skeptical” as they claim to be about mainstream media, i fail to see how they don’t understand that google exists and is useful in the 21st century. Though to be fair, it’s harder to use now.

    I’m definitely not immune to it either, but i operate on a strictly factual basis, so it’s really hard for me to get caught up in propaganda.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nobody operates on facts alone. Unless you were there when it happened, you have to trust a source to some degree.

      Quite a lot of people just say fuck it, if its all varying degrees of shit, I’m not going to listen to any of it.

      Thats how word of mouth type stuff ends up on fox news, because even they know a lot of right wing Americans wont trust professional news stories over their neighbors anecdotes.

      We might think we use better sources, and check into things more vigorously, but our conclusions still require faith as much as any republicans beliefs.

      We still haven’t even figured out how to refute religion conclusively, for example. Juries still out on whether religion is fantasy or actual reality, whether we think thats ridiculous or not.