It can look dumb, but I always had this question as a kid, what physical principles would prevent this?

  • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 days ago

    Yeah IIRC that even applies to things like gravity as well. As in, we aren’t actually orbiting around where is sun is, we’re orbiting around where it was ~8 minutes ago because the sun is about 8 light-minutes from Earth.

    • Cutecity [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      12 days ago

      No, gravity is faster than light. If there was this lag, we wouldn’t have stable orbits exactly because of the lag you describe. Wave functions of photons also collapse faster than light when they hit absorbent material.

      • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 days ago

        wave function (something that does not travel) collapses (something that does not move either) faster than light (themselves?)

        this word soup does not make sense

        • Cutecity [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          I used wave function as a bad form of shorthand for the general properties of the photon, such as the theoretically infinitely extending magnetic and electric fields. Those associated fields stop existing when the photon is absorbed onto a screen. They collapse faster than light can travel. This doesn’t ruin much of modern theories, because there doesn’t seem to be a way to transfer usable information through this phenomenon.

        • Cutecity [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          I don’t think gravitational waves traveling at the speed of light is the same as the gravitational attraction being apparently felt faster than light travels. Similarly, electric attraction between + and - charges is different from electromagnetic waves being transmitted in the field. It’s not light that is “communicating” that attraction.

          • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            I don’t think gravitational waves traveling at the speed of light is the same as the gravitational attraction being apparently felt faster than light travels.

            I don’t know how you would measure gravitational waves without measuring gravitational attraction.

            It’s not light that is “communicating” that attraction.

            Nobody said it was. The “speed of light” isn’t about “light”. Gravity propagates at the same speed, aka “c.”

            This Reddit discussion on r/AskPhysics might help clear up your misconceptions. Notably:

            Just to clarify: when people talk about the speed of gravity, they mean the speed at which changes propagate. It’s the answer to questions like: if I take the Sun and wiggle it around, how long does it take for the Earth to feel the varitation in the force of gravity? And the answer is that changes in gravity travel at the speed of light.

            But that’s not what you’re asking about. Whenever you’re close to the Earth, gravity is always acting on you: it’s not waiting until you step off a cliff, like in the Coyote and the Roadrunner. The very instant your foot is no longer on the ground, gravity will start to move it downwards. The only detail is that it takes some time for it to build up an appreciable speed, and this is what allows us to do stuff like jump over pits: if you’re fast enough, gravity won’t be able to accelerate you enough - but gravity is still there.

            I get the sense that you’re thinking about the second scenario when objecting to the concept that gravity travels at the speed of light.