• Thann@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    10 months ago

    they said they didn’t think they had enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

    Its not the same thing, and if you read the report there are hundreds of pages of evidence, its not like they were short on evidence.
    It seems to me the biggest factor in not charging him was actually his senility.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      they said they didn’t think they had enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

      Yeah, because there isn’t much ‘evidence’ there. It’s all just circumstantial conspiracy theory baking. It really feels like they’re just grasping at straws, especially when they paint a grand conspiracy and then immediately point out the completely innocent possibilities that are more likely.

      It seems to me the biggest factor in not charging him was actually his senility.

      Or, maybe, because he willfully turned all the documents over and didn’t attempt to retain them?

      • Thann@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Did you read the report?

        From the report page 65 Biden says: “They didn’t even know I have this” In reference to notes he knows he shouldn’t have still

        Then on page 77 biden says: “I didn’t want to turn them in” again reference to notes he should not have retained.

        These are both from audio recordings, so there is actually plenty of evidence to suggest he willfully retained classified docs he knew he shouldn’t have.