• trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Obviously it isn’t new, but it’s important to point out so people can acknowledge it and work to avoid engaging in it in the future. Periodically engaging in this content is fine, that’s why we had tabloids, but old companies that specifically worked in journalism that have been bought and re-aligned with tabloid-esque behaviour is because we are willing to click on it.

    A few less clicks and more reflection on the things we click can go a long way, in my opinion.

    • Decoy321@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You raise absolutely valid points, but the obvious counterargument to your point is that serious journalism still exists. Tabloid click bait nonsense has been around since the printing press, and serious journalism has still existed throughout all of it. To say that “news agencies don’t cover real news anymore” is hardly different than the pearl-clutching nonsense from the very same tabloids you’re railing against.

      I’m not trying to defend this schlock, just reassuring that quality journalism is under no threat of actually dying. As long as there are people who want to be heard, they’ll find a way to be heard.