Faux outrage?

Do you count audio books as reading?

But even landlords need to at least give notice before they can legally enter.

From the text of the resolution:

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SENATE, THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CONCURRING, That the General Assembly of the State of Iowa rejects the decision of Obergefell v. Hodges ; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the General Assembly of the State of Iowa calls upon the Supreme Court of the United States to reverse the Obergefell decision, and restore the natural definition of marriage, a union of one man and one woman…

Does the Supreme Court even have the power to reverse a previous decision without a new case revisiting the issue?

And doesn’t it violate the separation of powers in multiple respects for a state legislature to tell the Supreme Court how to interpret the federal constitution?

“What a waste it is to lose one’s mind. Or not to have a mind. How true that is.”
― Dan Quayle

One person making all the decisions is a dictatorship, which is distinct from both fascism and monarchy.

Unless we replace the meanings of distinct words with the principle that all bad things are the same thing.

I’m using Wheeler’s version of the MWI, because it currently seems to be the most common one—but I think Wheeler’s version is a misunderstanding of Everett’s. So if that’s what you mean, I agree (although in that case I’d say “the Everettian interpretation” instead of “many worlds theory”).

According to the quantum many-worlds interpretation, such a world would only exist if it could arise due to a random quantum fluctuation at some point in the past history of our own world—which doesn’t seem plausible in this case.

Whether apple stems are perpendicular or parallel to the surface of the fruit.

CasaOS is not an operating system and more like a GUI for Docker

So it’s more like Portainer?

If I make a typo, rather than autocorrecting or deleting a few characters I delete the whole word and re-type it from the beginning. That way the correct spelling gets into my muscle memory and I’m much less likely to make the typo again in the future.

The two that immediately come to mind are Clarence Darrow and Cicero.

I think it’s a reaction to another institutional tendency, which is to treat the best known theories as if they were incontrovertible facts.

Science and history are largely the search for closer and closer approximations to truth, but those approximations are always flawed and incomplete. And if they’re presented as already-attained truths, a critic can point out the flaws as evidence of deliberate deception—and then present any alternative they like without its being subjected to the same scrutiny.

Pizzo stated that the party needed new leadership but other top state officials didn’t want him to be it. “There are good people that can resuscitate it. But they don’t want it to be me. That’s not convenient. That’s not cool,” he added.

Sounds like the state party dodged a bullet there.

Then you can change the channel and they won’t notice!

Yeah, but Fox is the gateway drug.

Maybe now Trump supporters can be persuaded to boycott Fox News.

No DNC officer should ever attempt to influence the outcome of a primary election

Yeah, the DNC would never do that.

They’re NFPA 704 signs.

He knows that states can only have one governor at a time, right?