

Poor FedEx drivers!
Poor FedEx drivers!
Yes, it’s what everyone has been bitching about since HRC got the nomination. But in reality they wanted their preferred candidates to get a leg up, apparently.
Is that slang for a Latin child?
It’s the gender-neutral spelling.
When you’re one of the star markets, they let you do it.
Seems like the stock was priced high because people thought the company would be growing. Now it is way down for the year but similar to where it was before the election. Was revenues dropping 20% priced in before the election? Seems unlikely. I would imagine Musk’s likely influence over the Trump admin from his massive donations was probably priced in, but isn’t that going to wane with his special employee status ending? Is Trump really going to continue to give tariff protections and White House advertising to Tesla without Musk ponying up more money?
Ah, I see.
Whatever happened to the Q people who thought Trump was actually in charge after 2020 and would reveal his power to the world by executing all the child sex traffickers and Democrats (redundant)? Did they decide Trump actually wasn’t secretly in charge?
Shouldn’t the hat read “45 & 47” or “45, 47?” The dash implies all intervening terms are also included.
What they don’t have is the Supreme Court in their pocket. Amy and John will need to show some principles for justice to have any chance.
I heard Vance ate the Pope’s cat.
This is very confusing. Whose alt account? If yours, how would I know what it is? If mine, why would I need to use an alt account to see what your had written 4 hours before the comment I responded to?
You give a lot of unsolicited advice to Americans. I wanted to check if you were the French guy who’d gone to jail 4 times for rioting. No. you’re a guy who talks big about what other people should do to handle a shitty situation but haven’t done anything notable at home.
What was it you said you’d accomplished in your lifetime? Oh right, you vote while your government fucks over the First Nations. What heroism.
Am I misreading it that the assumption the allegations are true is used to deliberate whether the lawsuit is nonetheless inappropriate on other grounds?
None of this means that the judge believed or found them to be true. It means they don’t matter.
Edit: On reflection, I had the right interpretation. Embarrassing for the others…
Making something disappear isn’t enough; you have to bring it back. That’s why every magic trick has a third act, the hardest part.
It’s better if we just blame the Democrats.
A court has demanded the Trump admin return this man, and their defense has been that they don’t have the power to do it. Now they publicly criticize a Senator for trying to get the man returned.
They really are stupid when it comes to undermining their own case, aren’t they?
You have to weigh the likelihood of a warrantless raid versus another bout of heavy depression.