

Read “trump”, “give”, and “federal wildlife refuge” and briefly thought he was actually doing something positive for once, but of course not. Guess i’m the chump


Read “trump”, “give”, and “federal wildlife refuge” and briefly thought he was actually doing something positive for once, but of course not. Guess i’m the chump


had sex withwas raped by
FTFY


that seems unlikely, considering i’d never heard of the man before this


To give him “motivation” to keep innovating and bring us to mars, supposedly. God there’s no limit to the sheer stupidity of muskrat fanboys.


probably because whoever says it will be sued to high heaven by trump and his cronies, since it hasn’t been proven in court (and likely never will be).


probably because whoever says it will be sued to high heaven by trump and his cronies, since it hasn’t been proven in court (and likely never will be).


Thank you!


Could you (or someone else here) expand on what that means? What were these cell lines used for on more concrete terms?


Well yea, obviously. We’ve known this the entire time.


They may not be the same, but they sure are closely connected.


Unfortunately, treating people as inhumans is also very human.


That was a ramble almost worthy of Trump, so many words to say so little


It’s an LLM, why are we putting any weight into anything it says?


“The president isn’t a number-crunching guy, per se, but President Trump strongly demanded big numbers that would make other countries treat us fairly. And I think you can see today that those numbers are huge,”
HAHAHAHA


imagine getting banned from c/noncredibledefense, how pathetic do you have to be for that to happen


a whole-ass article that revealed nothing more than the original atlantic article did, so nothing is gonna happen from that one.


this has no new information though, just a rehashing of the original article.


I mean he’ll just pardon them just like he did with the Jan 6 people and others who helped him in the election


mythical? isn’t the venn diagram of those categories almost a clean circle?
I don’t think that matters at all tbh, defenses like those are only really relevant if there’s a case that goes to trial. According to the article not a single agent has been charged from killing someone. Not convicted, just charged with a crime. Including at least one example where the agent was clearly lying and just shot someone who posed no threat at all. That tells me that investigations are just not being done at all, they don’t give a single rat’s ass about accountability.