minus-squareCarlcarla@lemmy.worldtopolitics @lemmy.world•Does “and” really mean “and”? Not always, the Supreme Court rules.linkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 months agoWouldn’t (3) E = (!A) and B and C also be a valid Interpretation? linkfedilink
Wouldn’t
(3) E = (!A) and B and C
also be a valid Interpretation?