• 0 Posts
  • 9 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 5th, 2023

help-circle

  • I understand where you’re coming from. Obviously, non-violent means of enacting change like voting in reform should be the first choice to get things done.

    What options exist when nonviolent means are exhausted though? Your argument is essentially:

    “The government has the means to oppress the shit out of us. If it happens to us, there’s no point in fighting back so just roll with it and let it happen. I feel it’s better to have others force a way of life on me that I fundamentally disagree with, than it is to risk my life fighting for what I believe in so myself, my children, and foreseeable future generations can live their lives free of oppression.”

    With that, I hope you understand why I and many other disagree with your view.


  • If you unnecessarily bring a gun somewhere and end up in a situation where you need to use it to kill people, you’re a murderer.

    Even if he didn’t provoke anyone? As long as the gun isn’t pointed at anyone and threats aren’t made with it, there’s nothing provocative about it being there. I understand how others may feel different when their only exposure to firearms is what establishment news decides to show them, but reality is that the simple presence of a weapon like this is not alone a threat.

    If Kyle instead brought a concealed handgun (ignoring how that’s illegal for a 17 y/o) and only drew it a moment before when he shot his first attacker, would your opinion change? How about if it was a knife, or a rock he found nearby? What if someone else jumped in and killed Kyle’s attacker instead?

    He actively sought out the situation, and therefore bears some responsibility.

    He did not actively seek out to kill people, you’re misinformed at best if you believe that, arrogant at worst.

    I don’t feel that trying to stop property damage for a family friend’s establishment in the middle of a riot, where police refused to stop people, is a pattern of behavior I want to discourage people from doing. If a convicted sex offender tried to kill me for stopping them from destroying my friend’s livelihood, and I killed them in self defense, I wouldn’t feel remorse for my actions.

    I’m happy the jury ruled on facts and not liberal propaganda. And I say that as a registered Democrat.




  • Tell me if you were told a different series of events than this:

    The first guy chased Kyle while yelling threats about how he was going to kill him, cornered Kyle, then lunged at his gun before Kyle shot him. Kyle then ran towards police while a mob pursued him, throwing stuff at him including a heavy rock that hit him in the head knocking him down. The second guy ran up to Kyle while he was on the ground about was about to club him in the head with a skateboard before Kyle shot him, and the third guy ran up on Kyle and pointed a gun at his head before Kyle shot him.

    Care to elaborate on why you think the trial was a sham? Do you disagree that this was self defense? Or are you simply upset that he had a gun?