Classic “we must do it cause the enemy would do it worse” tactic.
Classic “we must do it cause the enemy would do it worse” tactic.
Tbf, i doubt the gov would keep doing business with him if the country decreased privatization and corruption. So him backing the GOP is actually the best move for him to get the most power.
And not only that, he is also projecting that dem voters are forever destined to vote dem… you know you can appeal to people still by changing what you offer…
This already happened in California many years ago, following the 1986 amnesty.
The only thing holding California back from extreme socialism and suffocating government policies is that people can leave California and still remain in America.
There are some other eye opening parts but this one jumped out at me. He really does see the world from only his viewpoint. He thinks California changed for the worse but he could leave to Texas and still influence California using money even though people chose a different form of government than what he wanted.
For him, the collective choosing to change the system is very dangerous and it has to be forever in a status quo so rich people can play both sides.
I honestly wish he was smarter than this.
Why does meat need lobbying? Most people already consider it essential and like the taste.
It’s like lobbying for sugar…
Wait a minute…
Yeah, but to be fair, any surveillance program is bad.
The first part is what makes them so weird.
Nah, it’s more like when you have a hammer, everything is a nail.
Conservatives only have one play, it’s to just keep going more right (as in, privatize things more and more to keep “fixing” things).
They have already gone after abortion.
What’s that? Fertility rate is low? We just got to try harder!
Personally, I’ve been seeing way more markers when you zoom in for bigger businesses meaning they are probably going heavy on pay to show.
Can’t beat it with people majority, need to have the land majority.
Well my original comment was about people saying he is smart. Not being dumb doesn’t not automatically mean you’re intelligent.
No one is saying he is actually stupid, but I’m calling BS on him being “smart” given how there actually has never been any evidence of that.
That doesn’t really provide evidence of him being smart. Which goes back to my point, there isn’t enough actual examples out there of him being smart. Being able to talk just means you’re not very stupid, smart is a higher bar.
People keep repeating that, where was this intelligence when he was president?
And on that note, what actions have ever displayed this “quite intelligent” side?
Of course they will, it’s not on them to do so differently.
Imo it’s on democrats and “left leaning parties” to appeal to young men and maybe put similar attention to men’s issues as they do for women’s.
I don’t find that hard to believe at all, young men are not fans of feminism and it’s affecting their judgment of leftist economic policies.
My favorite is John Oliver’s response:
I mean yeah, that’s what they mean by “small government”
Imo that literally should be the only response to trump and his followers in any situation for any answer:
“Where is ya wall Donny? 4 years and no wall?”
Six words! Six six six!
Linux was invented and the concept of open web and right to your own hardware, although that could change.
Also, vaccines.