Probably still schadenfreude, since we use the German word in English.
Probably still schadenfreude, since we use the German word in English.
Trump Refugee, Undocumented Migrant Plus Asylum Seeker Shelter Housing Organization Limited Enterprise
What a horrible name for a Pokémon.
Is that your alternative to voting?
Moscow Mitch
As an outsider looking in, it feels really odd that this could even be a firm issue for any voter. Like that high horse sailed so long ago, how can you possibly blame the current president for what has been a national policy for 75 years?
Sure, push for a candidate that doesn’t support Israel and dissent as much as you can. But every time I read a comment about “Genocide Joe” it screams Russian propaganda farm.
The alternative appears to be that same genocide plus an authoritarian state run by a corrupt egoistist BTW. Voting for a party is and never has been a vote to support literally every policy they stand on.
Won’t somebody think of the children?
It’s a slightly longer process to extract tea from a British émigré.
Get yourself one of them Elon chips.
I tend to put bread or crepes under mine.
How can you even pick up butter with Nutella on?
Cookies aren’t good? I feel like that’s a spicier take than Marvel movies.
Have you been eating them like apples?
Yes. Well, some saying we shouldn’t tax billionaires more and others saying that the money is better off with one private individual setting up companies and charities, rather than leaving that to governmental entities.
To me, someone paying only ~25% tax when earning millions per year is obscene.
It’s interesting as a thought experiment because there’s no real world example of this. Which I guess is the gotcha OP was going for, but kinda fumbled.
Arguably hoarding the wealth for yourself (and even your immediate family), never mind how you accumulated it, is still not “good”. It’s indirectly oppressive to collect a bunch of money, while many suffer, and say “noone else is touching this, it’s mine”.
Very true.
I was just trying to draw attention to some of the comments that are defending them. You’d think from some in here that a little smidge of philanthropy in retirement makes it all okay that one person can hoarde enough personal wealth to feed millions.
Reread my comment. I’m commenting on the content of the comments.
In these comments: People who think someone can accumulate obscene personal wealth and then give a small percentage away makes them good. But if someone dares suggest taxing that obscene wealth they are a monster.
I Googled “what’s funny” and it showed me a Mr. Beast video, so now I don’t trust you.
Oh look, another “political strategist” who literally looks like a reanimated corpse talking shit.