• 0 Posts
  • 87 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle




  • Exactly. But if we are honest. Canada joining the EU with no land border even close. Would be such a huge change in how it needs to work Vs other members.

    It is much more likely to negotiate an EEA like arangment. As customs etc would face huge complications with the US being their largest trading partner.

    Just about everything would need to be up for debate for such a deal to be practical on Canada’s part.

    Just things like electrical trade would be questionable. Localisation meant almost all other members were using 220v like systems before unification. Food standards make EU / north American trade in many products complex. So either way any merge is going to be long and complex. So differences will be needed,



  • But they also should have been more independent in the first place.

    Sorta comes with actually following agreements. And the US ignoring it’s own past.

    After ww2 the US forced European nations into following US fiscal leadership. In exchange for the fiscal support post war.

    You ignored the war for 4 years building up your power while Hitler destroyed Europe. Then used that power to entrape Europe into your methods.

    Add to that using your huge defence budget to overpower the spending of remaining world. And dependency on the US was not an option bot a act of force.


  • Unfortunately you elected him twice. Knowing what a arsehole he is.

    So now the rest of the world has absolutely no reason to trust any treaty you sign. It just time until you elect another nutter who will ignore the treaties when it suits them. Or the billionaire buggering them.

    Heck you started a trade war with a nation he signed a free trade deal with last time you elected him.

    You are not a nation to trust even though some of you may be sorta cool.

    Your legal systems independence is proven false and party driven. And your constitution seems intentionally meaningless, as a form of government control.

    While your second amendment seems to only increase the availability of death. With no ability to control the power of your government.

    You are basically a member of a failed state.


  • It is and has always been a flawed document. Never having the power Americans are so proud of.

    It never enshrined the principals of the declaration of independence.

    And has never protected the right of anybody who is actually challenged.

    Every group ever oppressed has found only changing the document allowed them any protection from an abusive government.

    And any US government that wants to abuse has found ways around the document. Even when changed. Without an agreement on enforcment independent of party politics. It is worthless.

    A 2 second look at US abusive history proves it protects only those in power.

    3/5 human

    Us citizens in concentration camps due to race.

    Just 50 years of body autonomy wipped out as soon those who opposed it gain power.

    The first step has to be to stop thinking of the constitution as some protection for rights. And instead to ensure leaders at every level are only selected if they support them.

    If the US cannot get behind that simple principal. It has no claim to protect rights. Any more then the rest of the world dose.











  • The penalty for impeachment has one relief: removal from office.

    Yep Article 1, Section 3, Clauses 7, but Clauses 6 also states.

    The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried the Chief Justice shall preside; And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

    So no this is absolutely not within the power of Congress.