Except the law did not ban the treatment she needed.

Don’t like her or the law.

But in her case. It was very much the fear of the laws rather then the actual law. That slowed her treatment.

Sorta exactly how what she calls fear mungering predicted it would.

But honestly. It’s not exactly impossible that a % of the staff refused to treat due to who she is Vs the staff own political opinions. Good for them. But she dose have a point technically.

Well while she is IMHO a fucking arsehole.

In this case technically her complaint is correct. The Florida law did not ban such treatment. So she should not have had to wait.

And it seems far from impossible her position and public face. Is part of why medical staff questioned the risk.

While I agree with what she calls leftwing fear mungering. IE we should be scared that these laws will lead to doctors scared to operate when needed.

That very opinion and fear or anger at her position is the reason these doctors hesitated.

Given this was basically accusing a politician of assault. Purely to Prevent him assisting a person in Court.

The amount of Expletive is Still way to fucking low.

Arrested For assaulting a police officer. Then Charges Dropped In a few Hours. Not only was there no case at all. But it is pretty bloody clear that the officers knew this at the time of arrest.

It was purely about not having to face opposition in court.

ICE really is turning into the MAGA equivalent of the SS.

Yep.

My guess haveing delt with the process. Moving to a green card process supported by marriage. Meant her student visas no longer applied. Only being married for 1 year. As this is why such claims are temp to begin. Means she may be deported well before her student plans are complete.

Even before the current insanity. Things like that were risky.

Exactly. But if we are honest. Canada joining the EU with no land border even close. Would be such a huge change in how it needs to work Vs other members.

It is much more likely to negotiate an EEA like arangment. As customs etc would face huge complications with the US being their largest trading partner.

Just about everything would need to be up for debate for such a deal to be practical on Canada’s part.

Just things like electrical trade would be questionable. Localisation meant almost all other members were using 220v like systems before unification. Food standards make EU / north American trade in many products complex. So either way any merge is going to be long and complex. So differences will be needed,

That’s OK. We all know how hard your working to train your sperm. Having it jump into socks when only American eggs are nearby. Is at least creative as a solution.

But they also should have been more independent in the first place.

Sorta comes with actually following agreements. And the US ignoring it’s own past.

After ww2 the US forced European nations into following US fiscal leadership. In exchange for the fiscal support post war.

You ignored the war for 4 years building up your power while Hitler destroyed Europe. Then used that power to entrape Europe into your methods.

Add to that using your huge defence budget to overpower the spending of remaining world. And dependency on the US was not an option bot a act of force.

Unfortunately you elected him twice. Knowing what a arsehole he is.

So now the rest of the world has absolutely no reason to trust any treaty you sign. It just time until you elect another nutter who will ignore the treaties when it suits them. Or the billionaire buggering them.

Heck you started a trade war with a nation he signed a free trade deal with last time you elected him.

You are not a nation to trust even though some of you may be sorta cool.

Your legal systems independence is proven false and party driven. And your constitution seems intentionally meaningless, as a form of government control.

While your second amendment seems to only increase the availability of death. With no ability to control the power of your government.

You are basically a member of a failed state.

It is and has always been a flawed document. Never having the power Americans are so proud of.

It never enshrined the principals of the declaration of independence.

And has never protected the right of anybody who is actually challenged.

Every group ever oppressed has found only changing the document allowed them any protection from an abusive government.

And any US government that wants to abuse has found ways around the document. Even when changed. Without an agreement on enforcment independent of party politics. It is worthless.

A 2 second look at US abusive history proves it protects only those in power.

3/5 human

Us citizens in concentration camps due to race.

Just 50 years of body autonomy wipped out as soon those who opposed it gain power.

The first step has to be to stop thinking of the constitution as some protection for rights. And instead to ensure leaders at every level are only selected if they support them.

If the US cannot get behind that simple principal. It has no claim to protect rights. Any more then the rest of the world dose.

After 2 180s you are pointing the right way or never were.

Given at some point trump was not in charge. Seems another angle is needed for them all to be idiotic.

They are idiotic just not 180s

So can any nation with its own currency. Its has a cost in the value of the currency though.

I imagine trump is still learning. Or more to the point, failing to

It genuinely does not matter if Trump had a homoerotic relationship with numurous KGB assets

It dose if putin is able to use the events to manipulate him. And if it happened under the KGB it is very likely the evidence and agents are still assessable todays intelligenceagents.

You and I may not give a shit about 37yo sex acts. But trump is very much manipulatable about his percieved manhood.

While putin is very willing to use such evidence to manipulate.

He also says its technically a 4th term. Still claiming 2020 was his win.

Hence he is already claiming the 22nd ammendment has been invalidated.

My guess he plans to claim any election that removes him is invalid.

An unfounded assumption.

She was a temp(interim president). But has also been replaced with a temp(acting president) from the board. So unless you can specify another reason for her resignation. It was not just ending the temp contract.

Article 6 clearly states Congress dose not have the authority to remove an impeached president. Only the senate.

Thay do was your statement attacking me dose not change the facts.

Pity. I was hoping it was my vision. And it was made from tiny pics of mushroom shaped penises.

Any artists reading. Feel free to take this as inspiration.

Sorry visually impaired.

What is wrong with this The pic in the article looks typical to me. Am I missing something due to my vision?

Only negative I can see is the choice of subject.

The penalty for impeachment has one relief: removal from office.

Yep Article 1, Section 3, Clauses 7, but Clauses 6 also states.

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried the Chief Justice shall preside; And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

So no this is absolutely not within the power of Congress.

Descending?

Descending?

The administration/Monarchy walked in on day one determined to override any other authority in the US.