

*gestures broadly*
*gestures broadly*
The joke works better without including methane which is an odorless gas.
Surely he had concepts of a ceasefire
It also gratuitously uses scenery from Shreveport, Louisiana which is a very real place.
Green. Mario.
Woodward’s contemporary books are full of bombshell allegations that made absolutely zero tangible difference to anything at all. Yes, you get the never-before-heard juicy gossip; no, putting it in the papers didn’t matter. We all witnessed the downstream effects live as they happened.
I have War right here. It’s a great look into the minds and personalities and motivations of the figures discussed. But at this point it frankly feels like those scientific studies that empirically confirm things that “everyone already knows.”
She’s certainly helping more than Chuck Schumer is.
Are you in the US? They can’t. It’s legally required to be opt-in with affirmative consent.
But her emails!
refusing to stack courts
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_judges_appointed_by_Joe_Biden
The total number of Biden Article III judgeship nominees confirmed by the United States Senate was 235, including one associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, 45 judges for the United States courts of appeals, 187 judges for the United States district courts and two judges for the United States Court of International Trade. Biden did not make any recess appointments to the federal courts.
Biden had the most Article III judicial nominees confirmed during a president’s first year in office since Ronald Reagan in 1981.[2] Biden appointed the most federal judges during the first two years of any presidency since John F. Kennedy.[3] Biden reached the milestone of 200 federal judicial confirmations on May 22, 2024. This rate of judicial confirmations exceeded the pace of Donald Trump in his first term.[4]
The average American family would have to stop buying eggs, for example.
Bird flu is taking care of that already
Sen. Tim Kaine, Virginia
$KRUZ
You can buy $NANC and do the same
What am I supposed to do?
I don’t know. But I do know that the correct answer usually isn’t to find pleasure in the suffering of others, especially in cases where many of those who will suffer did nothing to deserve it. That type of thinking is no better than the people on the “other side” who want to see the “right people” suffer even though it doesn’t improve their own suffering at all.
I hear and understand your position. But please consider the position of all those people who didn’t vote for this and will still suffer because of it before you smile about the people who did.
We all know how they feel. I want to know how galaskorz@discuss.online
feels.
Man got in a fistfight with electricity