Is non violent insurrection on the table?
Is non violent insurrection on the table?
If you are a fan of the show, yes.
Nah. Fatty Owls is named after the hotel.
Chuck is all about Charles Carmichael. (Streeeeeeeetch).
Yeah. I may have to exclude medical/investigative.
House, Sherlock, Columbo, Reacher, Lucifer
Watching it now it almost seems like a parody.
Yeah. I’m stretching my rule as much as possible. I’m basically trying to exclude all characters that have already been audience tested. Parody is sort of included in that.
BTVS was a film first, so I’m claiming spin-off. But you are right, that show would be less without her.
Bond spin-off?
Film spin-off
Cheers spin-off. Doesn’t count.
E.g. joey, young Sheldon, mork & mindy.
All tv shows named after the main character are better without that character (spin-offs excluded obvs).
Seinfeld
Dawsons creek
Rosanne
Ellen
Exception that proves the rule
Columbo
Not true any more. Banks don’t have to hold cash.
Chefs can put as much butter, cream, salt, sugar and fat as they like into restaurant meals. That’s why they tastes so good.
If you are playing that card, under which president will the Palestinians have it worse?
That’s it?
Strong “what have the Romans done for us” vibes.
Just like police officers
Madoff was straight up ponzi scheme fraud, not profit maximisation.
Enron guys were fraudulently booking future possible revenues as certainties.
Deliberate illegal misrepresentation is very different from making a (possibly) sub optimal business decision.
Couldn’t the next president rip that order up and replace it with their own definition?