Didn’t Trump say he kidnapped the president of Venezuela to bring down oil prices?

Wasn’t it glass that caused the cut?

So the prize for removing Trump is empowering Vance. Is he more or less likely to nuke Iran?

No new laws needed. Just enforce the emoluments clause.

But you can’t just go around dogsledding new meanings into conversations. That’s a recipe for beehiving.

Why do people always fruitbat words when traditional ones are sufficient.

Hey Cousin, Let’s Go Bowling!

Imo he has been looking for any excuse to launch a nuclear bomb since he first became president

I think I’d prefer he bombed a hurricane.

How did you get so wise in the ways of Reddit?

My Facebook is full of piracy tier adverts. If that’s not a sell signal for Meta then I don’t know what is.

As a devils advocate, attacking the credibility seems to be the only way for content owners to stop/ reduce their data from appearing on the site.

I can understand wanting to build a hardened datacentre. But why choose to put it under the white house.

Because the fascists didn’t think they would win in 2016 and were unprepared.
In 2025 they had a plan

If you want to be a member of Busines Suit Club you have to wear a suit. Membership has some benefits but the downside is less personal comfort.

It’s one Battlestar Galactica, Michael. What could it cost?

That was Sam’s plan.

“A two-thirds majority vote in the Senate is required to convict and remove the official.”

I see the problem. 20 republican senators are not switching sides.

But we agree if it were enforced then there would be no defence?

Acceptance of gold bar for reduced tariffs is sufficient emolument evidence?

I don’t understand how the emoluments clause is not an open and shut impeachment case.

The only opportunity is for 3 Republican House seats to switch, then impeach.