There are very few actual republicans or conservatives now. What you are describing is not historical conservatism either socially or fiscally.

Ah I see, that’s a huge deal then

This only affects Maine and Nebraska who split electoral college votes though yes? It ensures the popular vote takes all, but that already happens almost everywhere?

Outsiders can agree all they want about that fact, but truth is created in small rooms it seems, and that truth can be very different than day to day reality. The rules of the game that were setup are complicated, and the players are currently still willing to play even though they didn’t originally know or imagine playing the game this way themselves, it seems to them to be a valid way to play. The regular people also play along, because of the rules of the game, even though how it’s played has changed, and some rules they thought couldn’t be changed can be, so they don’t all like playing anymore, but they are always the first to try to leave the game, so there are many guard rails in place to see that they cannot disturb the real players too much. Even though they could… Generally they don’t. So no, sanity is not politics, but that’s already baked in.

2+2=5 is not politics. Politics is a game of power, popularity, and persuasion, not math. If everyone in power says no, then it’s no.

You can’t prove a cover-up for mental failings when that person is getting up in front of everyone and talking on a regular basis. You might think it’s evil talk, you may even think it’s nonsensical babbling most of the time, but a shitload of people don’t think that. There are no consequences possible because this is an active choice, not a surprise outcome with a cover-up.

The US cannot boycott anything, but if they did, the venue owners would fold in less than 60 days.

They really mean this was fun, but they’d like a more effective version of the same.

Fuck around and get fucked, sometimes literally

I don’t think that’s the logic. Gay people don’t just go back to having babies because they had some rights removed.

The policy is deeply rooted in the concept of in groups and out groups.

Even the claim it’s perjury is dubious, as you can consider the facts of a case and conclude not guilty for any reason. The line between premeditated not guilty and “considering the facts” first then rendering not guilty anyway, is incredibly thin.

We also don’t officially declare war.

I don’t think she has what it takes to come back from where you’ve gone. The next democratic president will have to match or exceed the current regime change policy and be able to ignore laws and norms and gerrymander to get enough power to do anything. Dems have nobody cutthroat enough to do these things.

Yes, the more specific you filter the community towards the niche culture, the higher the probability. But to get there you’d probably have to filter down to specific sub-communities in specific parts of specific towns. I feel it’s intellectually safe to call the rest a vast majority overall.

Despite the down votes, this is the real answer to your question. No the vast majority will not find it appealing. You would be highly selectively filtering your audience. The answer to why, is culture.

You got crushed by the hive mind, but this is the real answer

The right of the people would be interpreted to be citizens 100% guaranteed.

Removed by mod

It requires drill down now and doesn’t list visits on the location itself which is a huge negative.

Doing so should automatically trigger a review, where losing again automatically means you lose your seat and a special election is called.