• 0 Posts
  • 24 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 6th, 2023

help-circle
  • Without any studies as backing, my best guess is “Dogs have owners, cats have servents”.

    Alternatively: Dog thinks ‘Human gives me food and cleans my poop. Human must be a god!’. Cat thinks ‘Human gives me food and cleans my poop. I must be a god!’

    And apparently cats have us psychologically hacked to adore them in multiple ways. Like how their purr is helpful for human stress relief.

    Tl;dr I think it’s because cats own you back, and a narcissist would have an easy time hating them for that.




  • No kids. They’re a huge, life long commitment that you need to be willing to sacrifice everything for. Your happiness, your sanity, your time, your money… everything.

    And I’m not the type of person who wants kids nearly enough to do that.

    Especially when people tell me that I should for reasons like having a caretaker when I’m older. I’m not attached to my parents enough to do that. Why would I expect that of anything I pop out? And what a horrible selfish reason to make a new human that is!

    If the only reason I’d be having a kid is selfish reasons in the distant future that aren’t even a guarantee, then that’s not worth sacrificing myself for right now.

    Nothing against other people who want to be parents, so long as they’re prepared and not doing it as some sort of life insurance or to make a clone of themselves.


  • There are too many damn love songs. 75% of all music does not need to be about love, relationships, and breakups. I stopped listening to radio because all the damn love songs got annoying.

    Can we please have more songs about literally anything else. Weed, flowers, rainy days, animal companions, construction work, types of cars, card games, anything. There’s more in life to sing about than just relationships and/or the lack of them!

    Sincerely, A person whose sexuality is “No” and has no interest in that kind of relationship.



  • I used to use Reddit every day. I just replaced Reddit time with Lemmy and YouTube.

    If YouTube goes down… I’ll live. It’s not a life support thing like income or housing so I’ll just find other things to fill the hole.

    Will it suck? Sure. Will I live? Yep. I’d prefer they put out a reasonably affordable subscription instead of just nuking themselves with ads and more enshittification, but it’s not like life itself depends on YouTube.

    Their current subscription is too pricey. At least last I looked.

    They can get some of my money if they put out a sufficiently lower priced option. I paid for Reddit premium and used none of the features I just liked the site before Steve Huffman decided to be super extra shitty. I’d do the same for YouTube.






  • If your keyboard has home/end buttons (right side, towards the top for me) and scroll to top does what it sounds like, you can probably ditch that one.

    Pressing home automatically sends you to the top of the page, pressing end sends you to the bottom.

    I personally got rid of Honey because I got word of it being a data harvester, which makes sense to me since it spammed advertising to YouTube sponsorships despite being a “free” thing… so I honestly didn’t bother looking to far into that I just chucked it and moved on. It wasn’t important enough for me to bother checking how they got the money to advertise through content creators.

    I do use Dark Reader, RES (rip Reddit though. RES gets far less use now but I’m still keeping it), Sponsorblock, Return YouTube Dislike, and uBlock Origin from that list. So obviously I (currently) agree with them.




  • Hmm.

    • Usually open world. I like occasional other types, but a world with an explorable world map is more likely to keep my attention.
    • Has to at least start more green than city. Cityscapes/Sci-fi settings bore me visually. This applies to real life too.
    • Bright. If I need to play at night with lights off to see where the heck I’m going, I don’t like it.
    • Usually some creature in the world to catch my interest. Like (inklings/octolings/salmonids in Splatoon).
    • A good story is nice but not at all needed. I like environmental storytelling and aimless wandering.
    • No “game complete”. I want to keep my save file forever.

    Not hard rules of course, I have exceptions.

    Like Metroid sounds perfect for me in some ways, but because it’s so dim and sci-fi, I can’t stay interested. Unlike Zelda, which usually starts with brightly lit forests that keep me in.

    Splatoon has amazingly dark lore that’s only visible past it’s bright happy exterior that I LOVE. Stardew Valley/Minecraft/Animal Crossing are in my alley.


  • Hmm.

    • Usually open world. I like occasional other types, but a world with an explorable world map is more likely to keep my attention.
    • Has to at least start more green than city. Cityscapes/Sci-fi settings bore me visually. This applies to real life too.
    • Bright. If I need to play at night with lights off to see where the heck I’m going, I don’t like it.
    • Usually some creature in the world to catch my interest. Like (inklings/octolings/salmonids in Splatoon).
    • A good story is nice but not at all needed. I like environmental storytelling and aimless wandering.
    • No “game complete”. I want to keep my save file forever.

    Not hard rules of course, I have exceptions.

    Like Metroid sounds perfect for me in some ways, but because it’s so dim and sci-fi, I can’t stay interested. Splatoon has amazingly dark lore that’s only visible past it’s bright happy exterior that I LOVE. Stardew Valley/Minecraft/Animal Crossing are in my alley.


  • It was my first browser. I used IE to download it.

    When I changed computers I did use Chrome for a bit. Then Vivaldi because it was better to me (I liked the split window browsing)

    Saw mention that Chrome and all related browsers were about to kill adblockers. Returned home to Firefox immediately.

    I don’t feel a need to change right now, but have heard of Waterfox and Librewolf as potential forks. They’re in my mind if I ever feel the need.




  • Thank you.

    It’s not people using the neutral that bothers me, it’s the fact that the neutral is both singular and plural while the non neutrals are only singular/plural.

    and the plural part also alters the entire sentence structure to plural.

    “He is over there” - Singular and easy to understand

    “They is over there” - Just sounds wrong.

    “They are over there” - Both singular and plural. Is it a person of unspecified nature or multiple people of mixed ones?

    English could use a popularization of a strictly singular neutral that doesn’t carry implications of being an object rather than a being (“It is over there”)