My response is that you dodged again. To be clear, the question you dodged was:
When has she ever denied being wealthy?
My response is that you dodged again. To be clear, the question you dodged was:
When has she ever denied being wealthy?
You’re dodging a question you were called out on and don’t have an answer for.
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High
I find this very funny. Can we get an Obama awarding himself meme in here?
Because of the original commenter’s pfp and instance, I’m now picturing a furry insurrection and its kinda terrifying.
Only 1000? Newbie numbers right there.
Thanks for letting everyone know you’re not worth conversing with on the second comment. Nice that you let that out early.
On stage, during a campaign event, for nearly an hour? Lol, no. That’s weird.
The video is still up on twitter for me. Regardless, here’s the source from fox news.
https://youtu.be/eRBhzBd2afE?si=HWLxq4Qxl6i5tpiB&t=76
The bit in the twitter post ends at 2:36.
It looks like the real benefit of the doubt is that he’s hopefully talking about laws on voter ID being fixed. Still, what the hell is a presidential candidate doing telling people they don’t need to vote anymore? Even with the benefit of the doubt, this shit is ominous.
Edit: to be clear, I don’t give him the benefit of the doubt. All I’m saying is if somebody wants to, this is the best they’re able to do. It’s also important to be aware of the context of the quote, even if you believe he means it in the worst way.
Did you even read what I said? I agree with you there. But technically, and I’m only bringing this up because you the original commenter* originally did, it is an accusation.
*Edit: I thought you were the same person, but my point still stands.
This particular case is, technically, an accusation, though. Even if we’re all just about certain that it’s true.
Oh, I know. But the original comment you responded to said “I respect people who have faith” which is why I brought it up. I also believe faith itself is dumb and have little respect for it.
Somebody needs to tell Trump that his religion expects him to follow the commandments, not break them. Bet he’ll feel real silly for mixing that up.
Why shouldn’t people who have a faith be respected?
It’s on Twitter.
Correct. You wouldn’t want a convicted felon as president, would you?
Fair, but these are all perfectly valid reasons to do so on Lemmy as well, so I still think it makes more sense to do so here than on Reddit.
Why? I feel like that would be more common on Lemmy than anything. There is an actual point in using different instances here, I don’t see any point whatsoever on Reddit.
That’s half of what you said: