I am trying to focus on posting source documents, as opposed to someone else’s reporting on source documents.

  • 4 Posts
  • 103 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle




  • The meat:

    “Having argued to the jury that President Trump has great financial resources, Plaintiff is in no position to contradict herself now and contend that she requires the protection of a bond during the brief period while post-trial motions are pending,” he huffs. “This fact nullifies risk to the judgment creditor and weighs heavily in favor of an unsecured stay.”

    Only problem with that is that it’s not Plaintiff who is requiring a bond pending appeal. It is the United States of America.















  • The state of Missouri appealed the decision, arguing that the jury selection process had been discriminatory on religious grounds. An appeals court sided with Finney, ruling the jurors had been eliminated due to their beliefs about homosexuality, not because they were Christians. Missouri appealed that decision to the Supreme Court, which declined Tuesday to hear the case.

    Constitutional rights, as Alito must surely know, come into conflict all the time, and it is the courts’ responsibility to balance one right against another.

    Yes, you have a right to your religion and its beliefs, but that right must yield when it infringes on other people’s rights. None of this amounts to the courts “labeling someone as a bigot and treating them as such.” I can label those people as bigots and treat them as such, because I am not a judge, and “bigot” is not a protected class.

    c/SCOTUSJusticesWithPunchableFaces