“…It’s not about artificial enhancement,” [Hegseth] said. “It’s about restoring and optimizing your natural capabilities, protecting your longevity, ensuring you have the biological foundation required to sustain the fight.”

“But wait, there’s more! Order in the next thirty minutes and you’ll receive a second month’s supply of my Big Pete’s Big T Fight Boost for just the cost of shipping and handling! That’s a 200 Trump Coin value!”

“Don’t delay - order now!”

The power of your mega-wat is beyond my ability to comprehend. Stealing for future use.

Oddly, the American party of small government (or law and order? Which is it now?) seems not to care. The US is cooked.

So many people vote on comments based on feelings. Something true they don’t like? Down vote. It’s frustrating.

I reread your original comment and I think I misunderstood your point. Apologies!

It is comical that the overwhelming majority of the people I have known that most embody the tenets of Christianity were in fact not Christians at all.

Just because it’s propaganda doesn’t mean it’s untrue. The story tracks and changes nothing I believe about the US’s tyrannical tangerine toddler.

You have my blessing.

I want utopian space communism, but I’m not going to hold out for only that ideal when I can support alternatives that are better than the current system.

Remember that if you criticize the Democratic party and don’t ‘vote blue no matter who,’ you’re a Russian operative undermining the US election process. It’s not that you have a fully functional brain and see both sides are actually all on one side. Russian operative. Only option.

/s, fucking Americans

Now you’re just being stupid. As much as I disagree with all the libs lambasting you here, you’re just an ostensibly more progressive version of daft.

For what it’s worth, much of the rest of the world agrees with you. What you’re saying is quite obvious outside the influence of 24/7 US propaganda. I lived in the US for nearly a decade and was astounded by the fervent support for the Democrats despite their steady march to the right and betrayal of their constituents in the name of bipartisanship.

Your two parties employ the good cop/bad cop routine on a national scale. Should you opt for the good cop over the bad? Absolutely, because anyone who refuses to engage in damage control is an idiot, but you mustn’t forget they’re both cops and on the same team. The good cop is only being helpful because they want something, so they’ll do as much as they need to get it and will ultimately side with the bad cop over you to please their bosses: American oligarchs.

Be smart with your vote and choose the good cop, but don’t stop there. Work to kick both cops the fuck out, end your police state, and wrest control of the country from the oligarchs orchestrating the entire farce.

Oh do fuck off.

I know, I had hoped too. Many of us did.

I feel like even Grok would have made better decisions than these morons.

Did you know there’s this new thing called a ‘news article’ where you can read about what’s being discussed?

I used to be like you. I’d just imagine what I thought people were talking about, then I’d tell them how they were wrong. Now we can use this new technology to read about what is being discussed first so we can all talk about the SAME THING and tell others how they’re wrong! Wow!

The OP was even kind enough to provide a link so we can all read together! You should give it a try. The future is now!

I found her plastic surgeon.

Not a single emdash or any sort of dash in that response, mate. A numbered list does not a bot make.

I still question if that chilling effect was actually the movement or the fascist/conservative spin put on it to radicalize young men. It’s practically identical to the anti-feminist propaganda that conservative political groups have been using for decades.

One could also downvote this because they disagree with your characterization of the movement. Even if the movement did result in what you claimed, it was never the intent nor the primary result, so it’s a pretty obvious mischaracterization.

Your comment seems akin to “DEI exists to disenfranchise whites”. Have DEI policies led to a more qualified white person being passed over for a job? Absolutely, but that’s not the intent, so it’s not indicative of DEI policies, but instead their misapplication.

The same logic applies to #MeToo. If people misinterpreted or misused the movement, that’s not the fault of the movement itself but instead those people.