I’m misreading lol. Comment deleted so no one else is misled.
I’m misreading lol. Comment deleted so no one else is misled.
Yeah looks like I misread it. I deleted the comment so no one else gets misled by me.
You’re right, I misread it. I’ve deleted the comment to avoid misleading anyone else.
deleted by creator
A flight from Israel to the US is mainly over the Atlantic. Not sure if diverting it to a nearby country is an option.
If they don’t comply that is going to play into Putin’s hands and piss off Europe.
How so?
I personally doubt Trump will comply either. Israel has deep pockets and Trump loves money. But guessing what Trump would do is a very difficult thing to do to be fair. I could be wrong on this.
Layovers? For the PM of Israel? What is he? Lower-middle class?
America is not part of the ICC, they have no legal obligation to comply. Nor would they. Betraying or abandoning one of their assets would not be a good look.
I’m actually surprised. I didn’t think they would actually do it. It’s unlikely to lead anywhere, but this is still a big step.
Could be a case of them interviewing a lot of people. Keep in mind a lot of people go on vacation this time of year and depending on the company/industry it could also mean this is peak season for them. I wouldn’t look too much into it.
Best of luck, hope you get it.
The toe gets re-used.
That does not reassure me in the slightest lol.
Don’t be so sure. Even a lot of Republicans didn’t like the idea, which is why Trump had to walk back from it and say he didn’t know anything about. Which was an obvious lie. Plus, there seems to be a lot of people who voted Trump who didn’t even know what it would bring. I’d imagine a lot of people would be against this.
In mid-October, residents of Dawson City – notorious as the birthplace of the “Sour Toe” cocktail which included a mummified human toe
Wat?
Geo based IP doesn’t always apply and it’s more in line for a region than say something like a state. Sure there’s some overlap, but you’re going to also have a lot of misses.
It very much is. Networks don’t work on geographical borders. ISP censorship on a state level would be a nightmare to implement for a specific state without impacting users in a different state. On top of it the government would have to maintain a specific list of IPs they want banned given how easy it is to spin up a new website on a different IP. It’s not impossible, but it would be a nightmare to implement.
My PC has a secondary HDD that has my files. Movies, books, comics, TV shows, random stuff, etc. It’s more or less organized in their own folders.
Very true. That being said there are a lot of progressives in the country as well and some progressive states, or stores/institutions in those states, that would stand up to something like this. And I doubt ISPs would be ok with states trying to ban things like this because it would be very costly and not at all feasible to implement. So hopefully this doesn’t really affect online access to healthcare.
Of course then there’s the very real possibility that Trump will replicate this kind of enforcement at a federal level. It’s scary to think about but also a very real possibility. I feel bad for women in America and what’s going to happen to them in the next 4 years.
How would they even enforce this if the site is hosted in a different state or even country? Not like Texas laws have jurisdiction outside of Texas.
So Democrats won with people who were invested in keeping Trump away from Presidency and failed virtually every other demographic?
More of a regular thing for me than annual. It’s primarily Doctors without Borders and some international charities,mainly for the middle east. A while back my wife and I paid for some wells for some villages in Pakistan.