This is Core Inflation in the OP. It’s actually a basket of baskets of goods.

This is why I come to Lemmy — for people with even a passing understanding of the topics on which they speak confidently.

No. Next question.

Makes sense.

Happy to help! And, I totally feel you on the ragdoll thing. I’ve got a lot of dollars in loans in repayment from law school and it would be nice to just be able to work on a budget that I knew wasn’t going to change drastically in a few months (again).

You’ve actually stated one of the main reasons that TROs are issued. One of the required showings by the petitioning party is to demonstrate “imminent” and “irreparable harm.” In this case the imminent is shown by the plan’s policies and planned implementation as well as the fact that there was a date promulgated for commencement. Irreparable harm would be demonstrated by something similar to your scenario – the petitioner would argue that if it goes into effect and the final determination is that it should not have been permitted to go into effect, that monies which should have been rightfully collected are forever lost, absent an otherwise unnecessary affirmative and costly process of collecting on the marginal difference of payments owed.

To more directly answer your question, the court would direct the companies to collect in a manner which is least onerous to both parties (debtor and creditor); likely a long period of increased collections or (IMHO, more likely) extending the payment period to collect the now-again additional amount due.

I agree with you though, I think given the circumstances and gravity to individual debtors in this case the prudent thing is to stay implementation of the program.

It’s both. The case is being transferred and the program can go into effect (unless the new venue issues a TRO).

Me too, buddy. Me too.

It’s not moving the race, at all. It may affect the VP candidates’ approval rating.

Th OP article is the Senate, you’re right. The House is the easier fix, though.

Yet another reason to increase the size of the House to 1000 members.

It’s common to do this even when a President wins reelection.

Texas Democrats are actually doing an ok job. That state presents an unbelievably hostile environment to operate in. Florida Democrats continue to internally elect and promote corruption and incompetence, rewarding failure and encouraging ignorance.

The Florida Democratic Party is the most disorganized inept of all the state parties. Trust nothing anyone representing it says.

who is still needing to wait until 72 hours beforehand

Almost all of the voters who actually matter in this electoral environment.

Gonna call bullshit on anyone needing more details to make up their idea about the candidate in this race. Not saying you are posting bullshit, but rather anyone that says they really don’t know is full of shit. They know.

This is a bias you have because you pay attention to political news. You are on a political discussion board you are the exception. Most people don’t pay any attention to elections until October, at best.

1. What the fuck?

2. Most voters who fall into the undecided category 90 days before the election will not make a final choice until within 72 hours of casting their vote.

Voters’ revealed preferences demonstrate time and again they do not cast ballots based on foreign policy, climate policy, education, inequality, gun control, etc. It’s basically just the economy, violent crime, and immigration that decide elections. As such, climate discussions were properly left out of discussions at the most recent debate.

Average Americans and thinking the President is all-powerful, name a more iconic duo.

PVI is historical voting record. Holy shit my man, at the bare minimum understand a conversation before dumping your ignorant thoughts into it.

Losing by 20 points isn’t close, at all.