• 0 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle
  • Tetsuo@jlai.lutoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldSimple mail server
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    24 days ago

    If you do self host I suggest reading carefully the Gmail guidelines for mails. They are the leaders in the field and they dictate the level of security required.

    DNS forward and reverse, DKIM, SPF, DMARC, ARC, DANE, bounce signature etc. Email is indeed a very complicated thing to host. I work on emails system all day and and I wouldn’t host my own mail.

    Even worse I’m hoping email disappear and another technology takes it place. Emails are unreliable and outdated, they need to go.



  • Also as DDG is based in the US it is most likely legally bound to give your informations to any agency with a nice gag order on top of it.

    I can’t imagine any serious privacy oriented business to be headquartered in the US.

    The whole better privacy is true with DDG but certainly not to the extent people would like to think.

    That being said DDG has decent search results and is slightly better than Google for privacy. Google is an ecosystem so every little bit you don’t give them is a success.

    It’s really too bad we don’t have good private search engines…


  • I would use the second one as a backup.

    You could use one of these USB SDcard reader and script something that backups the content of the running/live SDcard to the second one on the USB stick. With dd or something you could have an always ready backup SDcard of the RasPi system.

    That or using an old Android phone as a media center and putting the second SDcard in that.

    Or using an old Android phone as a surveillance camera but that would be a bit overkill to have 256Gb.

    Also if you have an early model of the Switch you could hack it to run pi… homebrews and in that case having a super large SDcard could be good.






  • Oh I’m sure the incredibly powerful lobby you are speaking about will be totally fine with a law dictating the way they style and display their packaging.

    Also the pure nightmare of implementing in law what you say for a wide range of products. Let’s say I want to sell an individual vegan “steak” but I can’t put a large packaging just for the label ?

    Also, the purposefully misleading labels in the food industry is already pretty common so I think I’m not exaggerating when I say than any gap in the law will be abused.

    And it’s again extremely difficult to protect one single word without it’s context.

    For instance, in steaks we usually try to have the amount of fat in it because it gives you an indication of the amount of actual meat in your steak. Because I could wildly vary the amount and sell you 0.1% meat steaks that is actually vegetables which is much cheaper. It is not the first time that the food industry has tried to sell litteral fake meat. It’s an expensive product and if you can make it for cheap and keep at the same price it’s obviously worth it.

    What I genuinely don’t understand is why vegan products are trying so hard to look like non vegan products?

    Is it important for a bunch of vegetables composition to be called a steak ? If anything I would think a vegan product would want to stand out from standard meat ?

    You won’t convert to veganism people by selling them fake steaks. It doesn’t work.

    You achieve so much more teaching kids that eatings meals without meat is fine and we are starting to do it in schools.

    But thinking someone that ate meat all his life will become vegan because he found this wonderful vegan steak is imo quite delusional and missing the point.

    Food industry wants to sell you a product not matter how. Less restrictions for them is not a good news.


  • I definitely think people can and WILL get confused by purposefully confusing packaging.

    If the law says you can use vegetarian steak the producer will put an ultra large font STEAK and a minuscule “vegetarian” in front.

    So laws that ban explicit sentences are absolutely useless and will be avoided in a matter of minutes.

    I’m all for french people eating less meat but it will never work by “tricking” the consumers by using meat terms for vegetarian food.

    And I’m not gatekeeping the meat words for it. I just think we can easily find new words for vegan products and that’s fine and avoid getting misleading products.


  • Seriously, what is the real-world impact here? Imagine for a second that some miracle vegetarian steak could be confused for a beef one. Why does it matter? Someone might accidentally eat a vegetable?

    I’m sorry but you have no issues with a product label being misleading as long it’s pushing people to eat vegetables?

    Would you have the same opinion if it was an animal steak being sold to you as “Vegan steak” ?

    Point is, we don’t want misleading names for products. Imo people are actively trying to make this topic a political one when it’s a consumer protection issue.

    If it’s not a steak, call it something else. It will be clearer for the consumer.


  • I’m usually pretty relaxed when it comes to disclosure of vulnerabilities but this is the kind of issues where I think it would have been better to privately report the issue to the Lemmy dev and wait ( a long time probably) for it to be fixed before disclosing.

    Especially since currently there is multiple people abusing the image hosting feature.

    Not a big deal, but sometimes it is actually a better practice to give an opportunity to the dev to fix something before forcing them to do so in a hurry.




  • In France at least I doubt it.

    The only time I remember caps on landlines was when 56k modem were still the norm. Once ADSL was rolled out there was pretty much no caps anymore.

    I think the fact that we had some healthy competition for landlines from the get go in my country meant the ISPs couldn’t get that much greedy and put caps in place. So it never ended being common where I live.

    And when it was old school modems, well you were already paying for the phone communications anyway when connected to the internet so it wasn’t really unlimited anyway.


  • Tetsuo@jlai.lutoSelfhosted@lemmy.world[RANT] I pay $70/mo for this privilege
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Sorry if this is nitpicking but as far as I know, there is no such thing as unlimited mobile data plans.

    In most contracts they will say that you have to use reasonably the data plan and you cannot for example constantly max out your connection. Like 24/7 constant max bandwidth used.

    In most case it doesn’t really matter but I really don’t like the fact that ISPs get to say it’s unlimited when it definitely isn’t.

    It’s unlimited*

    • Some restrictions may apply.

  • Tetsuo@jlai.lutoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldWell well 🤨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think we should expect/aim to just have some “mass repost script” that can take an extract of a community’s content and just “repost” it on a new community.

    Basically, a script that would “replay” a community in one go. I don’t know if you could create “new comments” that immitates perfectly the original commenter but that would be the idea for a quick and very dirty “community mover script”.

    A bit like in GIT when you want to change/remove a specific commit, you can only replay/rebuild everything from the start by creating new everything posts/comments.

    Or maybe that’s a terrible plan ;)


  • Tetsuo@jlai.lutoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldWell well 🤨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    On a more technical level, it takes quite some ressources for a server to broadcast their communities to all other lemmy instances.

    “Receiving” a remote community is just reading data and inserting it in your instance. But if a community is hosted on your instance, you have to send that data to each and every instances with at least one user subscribed to it.

    So it’s really better for everyone to spread out on as many instances as possible. The only thing I would recommend before setting up a community (or your user account) on an instance is to check if you align with their moderation rules/code of conduct.