Under the change, responsibility for investigating cases involving federal immigration officers would likely fall to Homeland Security Investigations, an arm of ICE, effectively leaving the agency to investigate itself, according to guidance circulated among F.B.I. and ICE agents.
It’s just a scheme to be even less accountable.
Frankly this level of snap organizing and voting has me hopeful. Platner’s charisma was a huge asset, but people are still excited and invested in carrying through.
You’re asking for sympathy from the man who’s gone to be applied to the harmful man that’s here. Brain damage isn’t like a regular injury. It can change the core of your personality. That’s sad, but the person we should be sad for is his prior self and his loved ones.
This new guy is a few years old and a huge asshole to people who actually deserve sympathy. Basically everyone close to him other than his wife has left. And she has reportedly been fighting with him on his rightward turn.
Old him is dead. New him sucks ass.
That’s a good point. There’s probably a realistic comparison between the danger from hijackings and the dangers of deregulation.
We as citizens are far more endangered by our for-profit healthcare system and the risk of poverty and homelessness always one market turn away than from anything the military prevents. I bet a trillion dollars a year could help make is safer from the real threats.
Let’s just make the military budget a GoFundMe. I’m sure the super patriot bomb humpers will chip in. Maybe AIPAC can redirect their lobbying money to the effort.
Surely the military, which drains massive amounts of money and has never passed an audit, will be very successful in a simple capitalist market.
It seems weird in this time when short videos and call-ins to news shows are common ways for legislators to communicate to release a hostage picture instead.
“Hi this is Mitch McConnell and I just want to thank everyone for their well wishes and express my sadness at the passing of Lindsay Graham [or some other recent event].”
Why do the least proof possible in the weirdest way possible unless you really don’t want to be speaking on video?
An evil heart and a lust for power meant even as society changed he never lived a single day of freedom. It’d be sad if he wasn’t, y’know, evil.
71% of the party voted for progressive Platner in Maine. His politics got the most votes ever in a Democratic primary. We don’t have to worry about nationwide definitions of ‘base’ in this instance to argue about who deserves special deference from party leaders.
And I have a hard time believing this piece would EVER get promoted when people talk about “black voters are the base”, which is almost always only used to justify white centrists rather than, say, police reform. But for some reason it’s important to establish when progressives in 3% black Maine win a landslide and then ask for recognition by their own party leadership.
The reality is that party leadership has basically never represented any of these bases. The demographic that leadership represents extremely well is big money donors. Judging by leadership, that’s the real base. They’re the group that must always be catered to and whose loss they’d see as a 5 alarm fire.
I’ve said he’s responsible for his harms to others while drunk because even if impairment removes his self-control, drinking caused that to happen. But that’s not because I think raping (or murdering) is someone’s true self and they’re basically just stuck being a fundamentally bad person. They should pay for the consequences of their actions, dedicate themselves consciously to never reoffending, and then never get drunk enough to lose control, because that’s a consequence of drinking.
I don’t think most people exhibit personal growth (at least initially) by actually changing their fundamental impulses but by dedicating themselves to controlling those that are harmful. And maintaining that control is part of being committed to it. Maybe over time that changes the impulses themselves, but it’s curbing the impact to others that matters morally.
Why would being blackout drunk reveal your true desire to rape and not your true desire to consent? Or are you saying that being blackout drunk is not impaired enough to negate consent?
This sounds like you think non-consent from alcohol only occurs when you’re practically incapable of standing or speaking coherently (and thus would be incapable of rape). Basically a step away from just being unconscious. That’s a very expansive view on what qualifies as healthy consent, which is weird to pair with a concern about muddying the waters.
“One affordable home” is more than most politicians have produced. He had a strong interview with the BBC.
By definition, if you’re holding yourself back from doing something you don’t think it’s ok. It doesn’t change that you’re responsible for harm you cause by putting yourself in a position where your sober mind is no longer holding yourself back, but following this logic leads to things like saying drunk women can consent because they’re just holding their true selves back when sober.
I don’t think so, but the victim thought he was blackout drunk, so the only reliable choice available to his unimpaired mind would be never to get that drunk again. But he’d made posts (in 2013) about how no one should drink so much they regret their choices, so if it were as simple as thinking responsible people shouldn’t drink to that point it never would have happened.
But the end of Platner’s campaign was a massive relief to Democrats who saw their tough road to retake control of the Senate crumbling if he continued on against Collins in one of the most critical races on the map.
Nothing that’s been done by anyone in Maine in the last week has given this Democrat any relief. I was 1000 times more optimistic with the Kamala switch than this train wreck.
This article is very establishment-biased and presents things like the adults are back in charge and any problems are because Platner was being antagonistic to the party leaders rather than the leaders themselves lobbing accusations through the press and putting personal desires over party unity. The accusations that took him down may not be the conspiracy, but the Maine Democratic party leadership is definitely conspiring to maximize their personal power over what’s good for the state and party.
They built a nominating process where insiders get to pick all the voters while showing zero interest in engaging the campaign that won an overwhelming primary victory. He was right not to trust them!
It shouldn’t have come this far. It should have been revealed as soon as he became a leading candidate. We don’t owe gratitude for putting things off until it would throw the fate of the whole country into chaos rather than just be “oh well, obviously he shouldn’t be chosen”. No one handled this well and now we’re all going to suffer for it.
And just to make it clear, this is Platner’s fault first and foremost and his selfishness is leagues worse than anyone else, but fuck, people are dying because of votes Susan Collins made and everyone involved in this fiasco treated it with the seriousness of a small town drama.
The RCV aspect of their primary would also be very valuable, since it sounds like there will be a lot of options and little time to coalesce.
The selection will be made by 600 delegates to a convention, 500 selected by the county committees and 100 for the state committee members. It’s entirely insider chosen.
2 years down the line and they’ll issue the third final warning to stop doing illegal things, which the appeals court will immediately stay because a few months without optimal inductions into the concentration camps is considered an irreversible harm.