that’s not “the purge” at all. If it was then everyone would be allowed to crime, but he’s clearly just talking about the police. It’s blatant authoritarian rhetoric, but nothing to do with the movie.

Probably don’t even wanna get into it. Streisand effect, and probably just want to avoid all the discovery that would entail.

Are you gonna sue Fox News for being biased as well?

deleted by creator

I think just the opposite. he won’t say it directly but if you put all the pieces together he’s saying we shouldn’t care about ukraine and he would have just let Russia take it. That’s probably why Putin decided to strike while trump was in office.

“they didn’t extort ukraine for oppo research hard enough!”

“If you vote for me, all of your wildest dreams will come true.”

Trump’s platform is basically Pedro’s from Napoleon Dynamite.

Maybe if this was 2016, but now I’m pretty sure everyone has already decided if his sexual misdeeds matter to them or not.

electrolysis requires a lot of input energy so it’s not very efficient, and nuclear is still very expensive and politically contentious. And if we were somehow able to get new nuclear plants built they’d be put to much better use replacing coal plants than for H2 production.

*if we can find a clean way of producing H2 at scale

sure, young people only interested in names aren’t going to be swayed here. Taylor Swift has that covered.

her message is to politically active young people who may actually listen to what she has to say.

i would encourage people cracking jokes about the old lady to actually read the article. Turns out she’s pretty cool and has been politically active since her youth. Also proposes a coherent plan for young people who want to make a bigger difference than voting for a 3rd party will ever accomplish.

i don’t know what to tell you, that’s just bullshit.

I’m referring to the two extreme positions you wrote. Not sure how that’s so vague, but I’ll spell it out for you anyway. I’m suggesting you presented two hyperbolized straw men in your comment above. Very few democrats, if any, do either of these:

use extreme language when speaking of the risks of middle eastern conflic escalating into Europe

dismiss it as an unimportant issue as soon as it’s pointed out that they are actively contributing to that escalation

the position “in the middle” that’s closer to reality is something like “It is a major conflict that has the potential to escalate, but it’s also not the only thing at stake in this election.” That isn’t a false compromise, that’s just how it is.

or maybe you are hyperbolizing and the truth is in the middle somewhere.

Clearly she has no problem with calling world leaders war criminals, so why did she stop so short with Putin?

If you don’t think Trump would be even worse for than Harris in regards to Palestine, you’re delusional. Contrary to popular edgelord opinion the lesser evil is still better than the greater evil.

truth social live stream brought to you by Liberty Financial.

deleted by creator

Last week, more than 400,000 people visited a link posted on Instagram by pop star Taylor Swift that directed them to their state’s voter registration site.

Although Swift noted that she would be voting for the Democratic candidate, Vice President Kamala Harris, people don’t have to declare a party affiliation when they register and neither vote.org nor Swift track registrations by party.

love how they felt the need to point out that Taylor Swift, the pop star, does not track voter registrations by party lol