adhd_traco

I’m not going to go back to look at this nasty stuff for this purpose. But that’s reasonable, if it fits that context. My issue was with generally equating the term ‘handler’ as a crackpot conspiracy speak, when that’s literally a widely used term. :)

FWIW

I stopped reading the first time after this sentence. Which is a shame, because what you write otherwise seems well-balanced and reasonable for what you’re focusing on.

He also claims that the handlers (a term used for spy agent conspiracy theories)

Sorry, this statement seems meaningless, or even misinfo, because the term is used in credible reports.

For illegals, in-person meetings with their KGB handlers were rare, and usually took place in third countries…

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2025/apr/10/deep-cover-kgb-spy-recruited-son-peter-herrmann-illegals

According to court documents, Angwang told his handler he wanted to get promoted within the police force so that he could bring “glory to China”.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/sep/21/new-york-police-officer-china-tibetan-immigrants-spying-charges

Not everyone watches or remembers that. This is an excellent write-up. Thank you!

Whoops, gotcha

Enigma? He liked to think he was an intellectual, like Noam Chomsky and guests like him. He wanted his slaves to consider him as a mentor. He didn’t even do well at Uni. His places look like museums or some shit, not like a home. Pretentious, power-hungry piece of shit who ran an information network and had a scheme with Maxwell to enslave, often underage girls which he could then also adorn his information network with.

So this Lolita shit fits just in line with this. He would read monologues to his slaves and also, of course, from Lolita.

A cog in the wheel who personally just puts on airs.

First image: Google Co-founder Sergey Brin in the centre. To the right, New York Times Columnist David Brooks (who wrote about Epstein story being unimportant, and comparing it to QAnon). Left person I don’t know.

I’m not arguing against that, just drawing attention to what kind of ‘light’ they are given. It’s not like there are only two perspectives.

Note to others. The quality of the links isn’t great. And there seems to be an authoritarian communist et al. bias. Cross-reference stuff, and consider biases.

• sense8

• slow horses

• The boys & gen-v

• Arrested Development

• The Last of Us

• Rabbit Hole

Only ones I can think of at the moment that haven’t been mentioned