

Bernie knew this, to his credit, and made a point to repeat it often, but people weren’t hearing it.
Bernie knew this, to his credit, and made a point to repeat it often, but people weren’t hearing it.
This post has an excellent comments section for improving your blocklist.
Appeasement will not save anyone from the night of long knives.
But her emails though, am I right guys?
I’m pretty sure that the people at the companies I’ve worked at for the last 15 years have been following this playbook the whole time.
It’s basically the same group of idiots that thought Obama should’ve done more about 9/11.
Some of the people like the propaganda.
Just like a lot of Americans apparently have a fetish for terrible governance. That’s how I view Trump fans now to amuse myself. They’re edging themselves in the corner like: “oh yeah, Daddy, break that norm!”.
Someone should sue the administration for not enforcing the law. I’m not a lawyer but that’s a thing, isn’t it?
I could see how Laura could claim hers was unintentional. This one I think is a little more difficult to pretend away.
Lol Snoop Dogg has been a doggie dog sellout for a very long doggie dog time. The dude that rapped on Deep Cover, the Chronic, and Doggystyle might as well be a completely different dude altogether from the asshat pushing cell phones and making TV appearances with Martha Stewart. The same applies for Ice Cube.
Well, I’m not in denial. This country is full of fucking idiots. The next Democratic presidential candidate should be a celebrity that promises to achieve world peace and full gay space communism. Apparently empty promises and celebrity are what win elections.
I’m not quite sure that belief in zionism is measurable, but I’m sure you can find a source about antisemitism and zionist actions by Israel.
Anecdotally, I haven’t seen as many “stop the hate” campaigns that are basically about antisemitism as I have since the major military actions started in the Gaza in my lifetime.
I’d look it up if I really cared anything about the outcome of the discussion but it really doesn’t interest me that much to be honest.
You’re kinda sensitive about everything. You want a 300-page thesis before acknowledging that 1+1=2.
Which it’s kinda funny, this whole thing has been an aside but like…you said you tried to read it and didn’t really understand it. Is that really what you need to have a casual conversation about something? A proof, study, or document too long or complicated for you to be able to prove it’s wrong?
And my point is that you don’t need data and rigor for every single discussion.
Mathematics isn’t an empirical science.
And you’re trying to prove that mathematics works the same way as physics weirdly with regards to proof? It doesn’t. You do proofs in precalculus and none of them involve dropping cannonballs and feathers from the ceiling.
But again, we’re not talking about an environment where formal proofs are necessary. This is social media, we’re a link under cat photos.
It’s a basic property of counting though, right?
I mean I understand that there are academic standards of proof, but the idea that those are necessary for casual conversations about easily understood concepts is pretty ridiculous.
It seems like one of those bojack memes where the drooling person at the one end and the Jedi at the other end would both say just count a couple of rocks and the nerd in between would be saying write a 300-page proof.
Even 1+1=2 has to be proven.
Disclaimer: This is off-topic.
How do you prove this? Through definitions? An appeal to authority is not valid proof.
This line of reasoning reminds me of when people were saying the “square root of 2 isn’t 1 because mathematical scholars say so”…No, it’s by definition not one. Count one thing one time, how many things have you counted? One.
I don’t need a source or an authority for that nor for 1+1=2. I need to understand the basic definitions and concepts.
He’s an idiot. They’re all fucking idiots.
This creation of a fake world (or model) to manage instead of dealing with the real problems of a complex, real one is such an interesting take on how modern systems work.
I’m starting to think that the complexities of even dealing with real people and their actual views on the Internet were too much for the broligarchs to manage, for instance, and that’s why they’re obsessed with AI.
If you can replace the real Internet with one composed of strictly bots talking to each other, you’ve created a facsimile of the Internet that’s easier to control and manage.