It’s always had a “libertarian” streak when it comes to business deregulation, but otherwise yeah pretty blue.

Sometimes asking them to explain the joke will be enough to get them feeling embarrassed. If there’s multiple guys throwing this shit around that tactic could easily backfire, though.

That’s Saudi Arabia, and we let them chop up whoever they want because $$$.

Kawaiiiiii :3

For mail-in, you don’t sign the ballot itself. You sign the envelope, which is used to validate / track who voted, but is then separated from the actual ballot before counting so there’s no way to track who you voted for.

I think the context makes it clear.

The government can press charges on your behalf, but if you’re resistant they will often let the matter drop. It’s really hard to win a case like this if the victim refuses to testify.

I don’t know, man. If you start a gofundme I’ll donate, but in reality you’d need a mutual aid movement like the black panthers to protect against these militarized fascist thugs. Calling her a coward is bullshit, we can’t demand other people step up for martyrdom.

You’re the one calling her a coward. How is that protecting her? Start organizing and I’ll join you. Keep calling her a coward for refusing to step up with no protection and I’ll know you’re a hypocrite.

You can use an alternative term like “anti-choice” while reporting on them. You can also insist on defining the term whenever you use it. “Pro- natalists, who believe that unwilling women should be forced to give birth”, something like that.

His three election foes as the three-headed knight. Harris could be the head that wants to kill him. Hillary’s the one that wants tea. Biden is the one with the hiccups.

If you think about it, fish are usually galloping. They’re always running around with all 4 feet off the ground.

Yeah this seems obvious to me. “Can we swab your cheek to confirm if this is your son?” What parent wouldn’t want to know if their kid was dead or alive?

Coinciding (by happenstance no doubt) with the fall of monarchies.

Sic semper tyrranis

What do you think “immunity” means in this context?

You don’t get immunity for legal acts. The supreme court didn’t just rule that legal acts committed by a president cannot be prosecuted. That would be fucking stupid. Legal acts done by anyone can’t be prosecuted ever. That’s what it means to be “legal”. Immunity applies to illegal acts.

Yes. The supreme court just made it legal for the president to destroy the country by doing all that. Do you see the problem?

Finally! I’m freeeeeeee!

Not even impartial. Dems hire conservatives because they’re so fucking scared of being perceived as “political”. Alienate the people on your side to reach across the aisle so you can get your hand slapped.

What I wouldn’t give for a progressive party that plays to win.