AxExRx

Idk. I dont think expanding and accepting the corrupt scrotus judges as equal to the others is enough.

I think the argument needs to be made that the words of the constitution “shall serve on good behavior” means litterally that, and that therefore all the current R appointees abdicated their positions long ago and their rulings are invalid.

When the judges try to rule that they are still judges and that they say it takes impeachment, it should be pointed out that, as regular citizens, they A, have to argue that in court as a plaintif, and that B, attempting to rule on a standard they directly benefit from is intrinsically corrupt behavior that constitutes having quit according to the exact words of the constitution.

I thought they were just refunding the lease $ the companies had paid. Sounds like at least part of thr money is that?

Where is this guy’s PR team? Seemingly every other thing he says involves directing roadkill, often the genitals. You’d think there would be someone around to tell him ‘normal people dont do that.’

Or at least that if he has to mention mutilating a corpse, to pause and add a dramatic “for science!” Afterward.

"RFK Jr once cut penis off ‘road-killed raccoon, for science!’ in New York? New book revealed’ sounds way less psychopathic

I mean technically they can detain under citizen’s arrest/shopkeeper’s privilege, and then hand over to the proper authorities, or just deny access like a bouncer preventing underage drinkers from entering a bar, but neither seems like a good system.

Like Cheney and Nixon?

You’re probably not registered as an NGO, either

They really are a Christian party!

Journalists should treat this the same way they did when musk took over Twitter and set the press email to auto-reply with a poop emoji.

Many articles included references to that, saying things like, ‘we reached out to Twitter, but their response was shit’. Some fed it questions tailored to the auto-reply, so that they could report things like 'when asked their opinion about the company’s chances of survival under musk, twitter’s own PR dept was not optimistic, chosing to simply reply with a poop emoji.

Journalists (at least those not working for maga controlled / allied media) should take a similar approach, and characterize the new, null data as 0%, and publish statements like

‘In recent poling, Gallup found no supporters for the president, suggesting his approval rating of 0%’

Or

'Our graph of Gallups poling data on presidential popularity over time shows a sharp decline to 0% approval in recent months. (After purposefully building a bot / website scraper that shows null/ undefined results as 0, making that a true statement.)

As in they run all the queers out of the state.

Instead of dogshit, put a landmine in the bag then light it on fire.

No more neighbor to fight after that.

Common use? Like community guns you can take out from the library? Or are we talking a ‘take a gun leave a gun’ situation, like they used to do with Pennies?

What exactly do you mean by people like her? They want black people to be slaves. Same with women. They dont want either out of the country. Then theyll have no one to work, or fuck.

She realized she is rich, which means she can be thw one pushing people around if she wants to.

Fox News was created on the premise of prevenr9ng what happened to Nixon from happening again.

I dont think they have to be refered to the DOJ if congress doesnt want to. Also, Iirc, theres whats refered to as civil contempt, and congress can just vote to order the seargent at arms to lock her up (they can even keep her in some random room on premises if they want) until she releases the unredacted files.

Not only does this bypass any dependence on the executive and judicial branches; it bypasses their ability to interfere on Bondi’s behalf- she is considered to ‘hold the keys to hwr own cell,’ (as in she can release the files at any time and be freed) and it is considered non punative- there is no right to appeal and no sentence /crime to be pardoned.

They can also physically hold someone in contempt.

As in call her back in appear in front of thw house, then just have the seargent at arms lock her up in some random room ‘until she releases the unredacted files.’

My understanding is that this is considered non punitive and therefore non-appealable or even pardonable.

I believe all it takes is a majority vote, which considering 427-1 vote on the initial act, I could see them getting.

Im sure someone on here has a couple gigs to get them started…

TBF Hes been regularly displaying mental health issues for decades. Hes just displaying new ones recently.

I think the 2 of your’s disconnect is over what ‘ran on’ means. Most people would take that to be the main emphasis of the campign messaging,

Not the total platform and all its contents.

Eve if it were the case that the US could not refine it, they could still just sell it along to someone who could…