![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/94b2b808-7c9c-4de0-a35b-966d14ae40fd.png)
I think the absence of Bluetooth and the knowledge how to butcher an animal is enough to interdict your shit brother
I think the absence of Bluetooth and the knowledge how to butcher an animal is enough to interdict your shit brother
This screams of a performative princess that had no idea how to train a dog.
The one video isn’t the entirety of their interaction.
Maybe the kid retaliated too strongly this time, but kids don’t go overboard like that unless they’ve been bullied hard.
Teachers and parents all failed at identifying and stopping bad behaviour.
I consistently shit at work, I don’t want to disappoint the guy I live with.
If they were sentient I’d put them in the living room, so they could watch TV with us.
Any strong feelings are undesirable.
Be the change you want to see man
It’s the Kang the conqueror paradigm
This happens to me every day
That’s a big ask, and takes a lot of practice doing the wrong things before you get disciplined enough to stop doing the wrong things
You aren’t making much sense. You are asking how people would find out they are being defrauded before they are defrauded.
After your shit gets raided and there’s evidence that you sent out two sets of information to different people… Yeah that’s extremely probable.
You don’t understand how much of an electronic trail mass mailing would leave. If your mark and a burned mark were on the same email provider, a warrant would uncover this extremely simple scam.
I liked it too
If you pirate I Love Lucy, there’s no victim.
The way you phrased your sentence about piracy was biased against pirates. You were saying these moral choices aren’t similar, I’m trying to refute that, and I’m saying they are similar.
It’s not even current memes. If all my co-workers watched some obscure regional television decades ago, how am I supposed to understand the references they make without pirating the media? At what point do these creative products belong to society instead of a specific individual?
OP is talking about how there’s a different perception of the morality of these things, and the lesser harm(pirating) is being viewed on more harshly than (not being a vegetarian). This is the core of that discussion.
You did leave out the lack of legal access being a motivator for piracy.
Deserving is also an odd differentiation because people need to eat, and they have needs about participating in society. Maybe a movie pirate doesn’t need to access that particular movie but when their access is hampered in general, their ability to engage in discourse with their peers is hampered.
The other is a group of people consuming arguably more goods than they (we tbh) deserve since we’re not willing or able to pay for it for one reason or another.
This is a loaded way to phrase this.
The other is a group of people consuming goods that they don’t pay for, for one reason or another.
I don’t know if practice is the mechanism at play but I’ll ask around
The urge to fuck absolutely develops before the urge to procreate.
Walking into dressing rooms because they “just let you”