deleted by creator

Pretty sure you’re the only person to post there other than jimmydoreisalefty

I (briefly) accidentally downvoted you out of habit before realizing this is not the usual propaganda…

No but he would only agree to working one day a week as POTUS.

The trial is over, and there will be no more testimony

I see - I assumed wrongly they would need to testify again in a retrial if an appeal was won.

Wasn’t there also talk of declaring a mistrial at some point? Would they testify again in that case?

There is no reason to keep the order in place for witnesses, for example.

I’d argue there is plenty of reason to keep it in place for witnesses until all appeals have played out…

You asked for context; not evidence.

From her Wikipedia article:

According to The Wall Street Journal, Melinda Gates had been meeting with divorce lawyers since at least October 2019 after Bill’s business dealings with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein became public, and she had warned him about associating with Epstein as early as 2013.

Probably to bring French to the forefront after divorcing Bill.

Better question would be why she kept Gates but that’s probably for recognition purposes, I’d guess.

What if the SCOTUS has gone bananas at the same time?

It should be extended beyond sentencing until any appeals have been concluded.

Huh - I had assumed the gag order would have been lifted at the conclusion of the trial. Continuing it through sentencing seemed punitive, but extending it beyond the conclusion of any pending appeals makes sense and seems perfectly fair.

“I was not aware of that”

Any boomer/Gen x fox news viewer will now just think Donald did it and look no further.

Nothing like those Millennial Fox News viewers

Even after reading the whole thing (I think I need a shower), I’m not even sure what they’re mad about.

Ok - If this is where you’re coming from, why are you boosting this shit?

Please elaborate on the logical connection between a news article reporting Trump is losing his license to carry a gun and a screenshot purportedly from the Biden campaign.

And please tell me you understand the difference between the two. It’s not insignificant.

If this is a release from the Biden Campaign it should be trivial to provide a link. I looked and couldn’t find it, but that doesn’t mean it’s not there.

That’s a news article. Not a campaign release.

Is there a link? Why is it a screenshot?

TBH I was expecting a lot worse from him. I was doubly surprised he acknowledged Russia as a threat…

He’s going to get away with everything

Only the federal cases; only if he wins in November.