

The sheer amount of vacuum in that orange head surely must be causing issues. I saw what happened to Oceangate. Granted it had more than one vacuum inside.


The sheer amount of vacuum in that orange head surely must be causing issues. I saw what happened to Oceangate. Granted it had more than one vacuum inside.


How many more signs are we waiting for?


Yes, and Tucker Carlson. It’s kind of a thing.
The difference is that Beck and Carlson are actually more straightforward with regards to how they lean. Rogan always suggests he’s a centrist, sometimes even suggesting he is apolitical, which is patently false.


Thanks. I like to be extra careful.


Yes, I agree with that about confused young men. However, at the end of the day, if JRE turns them into toxic men, then they’re still just toxic men.
I would hope that doesn’t happen. In general I think we as a society need to be kinder to these confused young men before they take that path. It’s a more difficult conversation to have and the solution is not very clear.
Either way, JRE is dangerous because it offers propagandistic suppositions as answers to people with big questions.


Because if so, then it seems like even the slightest bit of critical thinking ability would easily steer men clear of it.
Absolutely correct, in my view. “Fear of judgment and a low sense of self worth” is also spot on.
Rogan gave national voice to plenty of people who regularly used the term “snowflake” to describe what they saw as weak people who like to complain (I’m speaking from memory here and generalizing; Rogan probably has also used this term himself, but I’m not searching transcripts, so take all this with a grain of salt). By this logic, a “snowflake” is someone who is perceived as weak because they let so much affect them emotionally.
But these toxic men are “snowflakes” in every sense of the term. They go on Joe Rogan to complain about trans people, or gay rights, or “the war on Christmas”, or the perceived persecution of “alpha males”, or any number of other issues. Some guests are only famous because they complain about such things.
So what is the difference between a toxic “alpha male” on Joe Rogan and one of the “snowflakes” they like to complain about? Absolutely nothing, except that the toxic men believe that anger doesn’t count as an emotion, so their insecurity allows them to show it regularly.
(And to be clear, there is nothing wrong with showing emotion or caring deeply about something – that’s not a point I’m trying to make)


MAGA will never turn on Trump.
They spent years harping on a “deep state cabal” that was trafficking children. When the world learned that the reality was actually much worse, but Daddy Trump was implicated, all of a sudden it was fake news.
If that didn’t do it, nothing will. They won’t turn on Trump because MAGA is a cult of personality. It’s not about facts and it’s not even about principles. It’s about each of them keeping Donald Trump’s tiny penis in their mouth at all times.


Rogan is a great example of a few things:
The Dunning-Kruger effect
“I’m just asking questions” being used as an excuse to host an unbalanced number of individuals purporting one specific worldview
Toxic masculinity posing as intellectualism
He is extremely popular with one particular demographic. That demographic tends to share the toxic masculinity and the Dunning-Kruger-fueled belief that they can be experts at everything from the armchair.


So which executives are going to jail?
None?


They like freaking out over social issues that don’t affect them, like the men currently on an anti-trans crusade.
They don’t like freaking out over actual problems we could fix in theory, like health care or income disparity. For those, they obstruct to stay relevant.


When will these idiots learn that the way to lower fraud and crime is to stop lowering everything else?
Want to reduce medical fraud? Make it cheaper.
Want to reduce property crime? Bring more people out of poverty.
Taking more shit away incentivizes more fraud.


Yes, that is the truth. “Flood the Zone” was also a favorite of Goebbels.


Wow, sounds like someone in the administration a) learned to read, and b) read the First Amendment of the Constitution??!
Feels like Jurassic Park when the raptors learn to open doors.


Newsom effectively wants the Dems to be less progressive. From my perspective, the Dems continue to lose because they continue to shaft their progressive constituents, of which there are many.
Things have shifted so far to the right in the US that mainline Dems would be considered conservative in many other countries of the world. The US does not have a left party, progressive or otherwise. If you accept this, then it’s easy to suggest Newsom is just one other centrist masquerading as a leftist. His claims here support that view.
There are many, many other reasons not to like Newsom, but ultimately he is a symptom of a much deeper problem.


I don’t think “fuck directly with people’s shit because you were handed an L” is a winning political strategy. Will it cost him? Hell no! We’ve never had a cult leader as president before.


There’s already a lot of MAGA people convinced that “activist judges” are acting against Trump just to act against Trump… You know, as opposed to ruling against him because he’s breaking the law.
Nevermind all those other SCOTUS rulings handing the executive branch more power. Those don’t matter. Clearly now it’s stacked with activist judges.
I wonder if anyone from MAGA could actually define what “checks and balances” or “separation of powers” means.


Is it in mostly ALL CAPS and does it read like it was written by some kind of deranged ten year old who just discovered ChatGPT?
Those are written by the President of the United States. That’s the timeline we’re in.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!


I wonder how many US citizens could be given healthcare for that kind of money


Yeah this clown and like half the Dem establishment needs to go. Maybe more than half. I’m not one for the “both parties are the same” bullshit, but between the enablements and the not listening to constituents, it is clear that many of these people are incapable of performing the duties for which they were elected.
Is this winning?