literally pissing

I think that’s not accurate. They’re doing it with bombs.

Wooo! And it’s one he hasn’t collected yet.

The USA is not a democracy

This question is not relevant: you’re not voting based on how the country is now, or was last week. You’re voting based on how the country should be, each time. You’re picking the least-bad leader out of a small set of options, based on whether they’re even marginally better.

In this case, a LOT of alternatives are better than the current setup, so I don’t understand the dilemma.

…thus, the suspicion about trolling.

Should I vote Republican to slow down full blown let it all hang out fascism because I don’t want to vote Democrat?

1. Evolution means choosing the better option in each case to invoke slow but important beneficial change
2. Harm reduction is a great short-term strategy
3. There’s absolutely no reason to ever vote the elitist racist party of kiddy-diddlers
4. If you’re feeling like not voting, or voting in a way that harms people for no gain ever, then you may be a victim of manipulation by the conservatives so you don’t vote against them. They’re good at this.

Questions asking whether someone should vote in a way that causes harm can sound like a trolling question. I’m sorry if other respondents treat it as such.

Is the CI/CD still a faithful clone of github’s worst-in-show setup? Because if I had a plan for ditching GL, the CI keeps forgejo from being a contender.

There is a community edition but serious users will run into its limitations

No true Scot, then?

I’m running gitlab implementations at a few sites. I’ve not seen or heard of any performance limiter with a self-managed community edition that removes a tool the others still provide.

and it does not integrate neatly with external solutions.

Again, this sounds FUDdy. Which ‘external solutions’ are you using that a git-push fails on? Some spaghetti of saas tendrils seems to be already a risk, but I can’t think of any other external thing that it could mess up with.

inperson

in-person

A computer program that is [non-biased] [needs] computer programmers [who] have no interest in politics.

Nope. It needs programmers who can work apolitically, even if they have a preference.

The difference is ethics, and if a coder isn’t ethical, he’s useless and untrustworthy.

that are

“Who are”, for sentient beings. I bet they’ve been objectified enough in their work, so let’s not treat them as objects here.

it’s no one’s business why people choose to abort.

This. The only answer to “why” is “fuck off”, and for so many reasons. It’d suck to agonize over the decision, and once it’s made to then be second-guessed by some rando.

Oh, wow. Genius plan. If the flatlander states aren’t completely toxic and ruined, they could be resettled as soon as the Cascadian and NewColonial state groups repair their economies enough to begin allowing new membership applications and setting up proper accessible care and prevention.

… and dirtbag richbitch reparation suits. They’ll pay for proper healthcare and rebuilding now with their tax money, or in a courtroom later.

made due

made do?

Yes, I think no investigation happened at all. Not one iota.

Yay! We’re going in 18 months!

First Big Ask

Nope. It’s a request. And real journos should know that.

It’s, like, THE STANDARD

Yeah, no clue why everyone’s going DST instead. I think having politicians make science decisions is a really dumb idea.

Wow. I missed that trial completely.

everytime

Not a word yet. It may never be a word.

Aw, that’s a beautiful thought. Thanks.

Dude, they immigrated from Asia. To admit one group and not another is a little racist.