eleijeep

About

AI-generated research, so it might be sloppy.

https://github.com/qznc/sloppy_research

Yeah I mean to you it might be pretty simple lego :) but I’m sure lots of people would benefit from it. Even if not to use the same exact setup then to provide an example or starting point for DIY.

Are you planning on sharing the source?

I’ve only recently adopted AI, and only sparingly, mainly for debugging, tests and help with documentation.

I wonder who came up with the name and the logo 🤣

Have you tried both ping4 and ping6 to isolate whether it is ipv4 or ipv6 or both that’s filtering icmp? Also, can you ping other hosts from your server (ie. does the echo-reply get dropped at the input?)

You could also add logging when a packet is rejected so you can see it in your syslog. Put this at the end of your input chain:

log level warn prefix "Input Packet Dropped: "  

Personally for me, the spirit of self-hosting is incompatible with using Cloudflare and Synology services, but I understand that less technical users may prefer commercial services.

I see your post from piefed.social, so federation is working here. Good job.

We don’t read The Sun in this household.

“Formerly-homeless” would have been a very easy change to the headline that an editor would have suggested immediately, if they had one.

I hadn’t heard of this one before, thanks for posting.

Edit: this website is very strange. The article is dated 5th June 2019 and the other “case studies” are dated to look like they’ve been writing regularly since 2019 up until now. But the article reads like LLM output, and the waybackmachine has no record of this article before December 2025, and no record of the domain name henricodolfing.ch before April 2025. The whois database says that the domain was registered in January 2025. So are they really trying to launder slop by back-dating it to make it look like it was written before LLMs existed? Fuck.

Lots of people who have never used Codeberg and don’t understand the difference between Codeberg and Forgejo are very angry about this.

This is still a problem for OSS licensing, since in order to license a work you need to be the copyright holder.

This might mean that OSS projects find it even more difficult to assert their licenses against violators in court, since they would need to prove that the part of the code that was copied was not AI output.

Banning the output of AI tools in OSS codebases is a sensible move for any project that actually cares about enforcing the license that their code is released under.

What exactly is it that you’re trying to achieve?

“Lurk for a while before posting,” has been a standard rule of netiquette for at least the 30 years that I’ve been using the 'net.

Yes that’s the one I was referring to.

Did the LLM choose the name? There’s an obvious existing semantic link between PRISM and intel, so congrats on choosing an un-searchable name.

Restic has quite a good solution for this: https://restic.readthedocs.io/en/stable/060_forget.html#security-considerations-in-append-only-mode

Shameful behaviour.

Made a flowchart for you:

< Do you feel wet? >  
     |  
     +-- yes --> < are you indoors? >  
     |                |  
     |                +-- yes --> < are you wearing pants? >  
     |                |                      |  
     |                |                      +-- yes --> [ you peed yourself ]  
     |                |                      |  
     |                |                      +-- no --> [ you're taking a shower ]  
     |                |  
     |                +-- no --> [ it's raining ]  
     |  
     +-- no --> [ you are not taking a shower ]  

Brute-forcing passwords on HTTPS is not really a thing anymore.

Why is that?