I don’t understand how these absurd arguments aren’t laughed out of court.

Who is John Sauer and why does anyone take this unfounded nonsense he’s saying seriously?

It’s paywalled, but no worries, we all know the answer: they’re going to carefully examine the policies each candidate puts forth, consider their respective past job performances, and make a principled decision with their vote balancing their own interests as well as the country as a whole.

Just kidding! They’re going to be “uncomfortable” voting for the orange asshat who will do absolutely nothing for them and whose goals include revenge and “absolute immunity” so that he avoids any consequences of being a fraudster, rapist and traitor.

We’re not tearing society down because of this.

Apparently where we all pee is a foundational aspect of society?

Edit: To clarify, I’m not suggesting we should all go shit in the streets or that public restrooms should not exist. Rather, it’s absurd to suggest that picking a restroom, one that someone else doesn’t agree with, will lead to the destruction of society.

Hey, there are some fun 3D printing projects you could get into if you look around. Sometimes it’s the perfect tool to launch into a new hobby! I’m working on a hydroponic tower currently, as well as some Mandalorian armor for Halloween.