go $fsck yourself

Ur mom giving birth to you

Congrats. You made the argument that popular == good.

WooCommerce also has an extensive extension list, integrations with all the payment providers out there and it’s easy to get help / support be it free or payed

This is WordPress’ biggest selling point, but it is also its biggest downfall. The vast majority of those “extensions” (plugins) are horribly made and are security nightmares, then they often only get you 90% of what you need so they can sell you the last 10% for a subscription fee. How would you know how to determine which ones are good or not? You need to be experienced enough with WordPress.

Yes, it is easy to get support, particularly paid (not “payed” FYI) but again, since WordPress is so popular, it’s prime real-estate for shitty “”“WordPress Developers”“” (not actually developers) to essentially bait people into their scam of pretending they are actually developers and providing work that leaves you worse off.

How do I know all of this? Well I happen to work with WordPress professionally as the lead developer for an agency where I manage literally hundreds of WordPress sites and host all of them myself on servers I manage for them (not shared hosting reselling).

Definitely not Woocommerce. WordPress’s data structure is not properly suited for an e-commerce site, and it’s a resource hog.

Is there a link to the video that is not on Twxtter?

Quit

https://youtu.be/1y8S0F__Wuo?si=d8yS1jxNwGN0DhLR

Counterpoint: idiots who never question things they want to hear are tearing America apart.

I find your perspective and words judgemental, assumptive, and accusatory.

I can see no evidence of a good faith discussion from your end, so I will no longer continue with you.

I hope these words might help you move beyond the veil that causes you to be so assumptive:

If you look for the light, you can often find it.But if you look for the dark that is all you will ever see.

Of course. No one literally thinks that “dude” always means man.

Your points in this thread are certainly implying that “dude” is always a man. When you say “if a word is either neutral or masc, then it’s not neutral”, then you’re literally saying it always is masc.

The issue is that those different meanings aren’t neutral like they claim to be

So, neutrality is a spectrum? How do you define the different parts of the neutrality spectrum?

because they rely on the idea of men being the “default” state of people.

That’s a claim that needs some data to back up.

because most men would be uncomfortable with that. Yet somehow, the opposite is fine?

I don’t give a single shit about what they think. Why should anyone?

That’s because context matters.

“You’re shit” and “You’re the shit” mean completely different things

• Fucks

• Shits

• Turds

• Maggots

It’s like the difference between “my shit”, “your shit”, and “that shit”. You’re not actually referring to your own things as feces, or calling it “shitty”. It’s just your shit. As in “Don’t touch my shit”. But when you’re referring to someone else’s shit as “your shit” or “that shit” it’s more derogatory. Like, “clean up that shit” or “get your shit out of here”.

The context changes “shit” from derogatory to neutral. Similarly, “dude” can be both gender specific and neutral depending on context.

Note that people are still allowed to prefer not to be referred to as “dude”, but it’s a gender neutral term in many contexts nonetheless.

Constantly telling people to install Linux, completely disregarding any nuance.

That’s the problem.

People deserve the right to an abortion, but the supreme court disagrees with that, too.

Fuck them.

“Oh look at that, wow. Mercedes, that’s pretty good. Wow, she’s good.”

Yeah it’s very clear he’s referring to her, not a car.

Yep. It’s the 2A strawman argument that has no place. “Liberals want to take away everyone’s guns” is a bullshit right-wing rhetoric.