Eh, a Tacoma is generally going to be better than a 3500 for climbing over obstacles because it’s more nimble and has better approach/breakover/departure angles. A bigger vehicle (aside from the tires) isn’t necessarily better for that sort of thing.

Engines have gotten somewhat more efficient in the past 25 years, but not that much more efficient. For example, a 2026 base-model Tacoma is a whopping 3 MPG more efficient than a 2001 base-model Tacoma (according to the EPA, anyway; according to vehicle owners they’re the same).

https://fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=16989&id=50081

Internal-combustion engines are a pretty mature technology, especially once you’re talking new enough to have fuel injection. Other than stuff like Atkinson-cycle engines (which only apply to hybrids), the small refinements in efficiency since the '90s aren’t anywhere near enough to overcome the vast size/weight/capacity difference from a reasonably-small truck to a gigantic one.

No shit your midsize pickup gets better mileage than a heavy-duty full-size one, even if the latter does have a diesel. Were you surprised??

Blood clots can prosecute the entire GOP for treason, RICO, and the rest of its massively corrupt and anti-American behavior?

Because if you try to discuss what needs to be done on the typical means of communication in the 21st century (i.e., fascist-controlled social media), you’ll be censored (and possibly referred to the FBI for prosecution as a “terrorist”) before you can even begin to get organized.

Well, if we’re talking literal, there’s also the issue that your comment was factually-incorrect and also kinda racist, so maybe you don’t wanna go there.

Yet another Republican suddenly finds his conscience once he’s a lame duck/out of office.

('Course, this one sounds like it might be more due to spite anyway.)

STFU about that until after the primary. It’s 100% inappropriate right now.

Not after the recent SCOTUS ruling, they won’t!

Notice how the article subtly carries water for the liberals/fascists by only mentioning Bottoms (a liberal) as the opposition, while leaving out any progressive or leftist ones.

The effective opposition to the fascists would be somebody like Jason Esteves (of the candidates whose names I recognize, anyway), not Bottoms.

Since Dodge v. Ford Motor Co (1919), if not earlier.

See also: https://reclaimdemocracy.org/corporate-accountability-history-corporations-us/

How old counts as “classic?” I’ve been using plain ol’ “up to 10%” in my '90…

us ugly people

[X] doubt

Headline is inaccurate. It should read “GOP rep humiliates herself”

That’s never been a guarantee, and because of Trump, it’s becoming even less so by the day.

His continued lack of incarceration has a corrosive effect on the entire legal system.

Case in point: your bullshit comment.

“Oh, it couldn’t possibly be her shitty policy positions; it had to have been because of her race and gender!”

Fuck all the way off with your soft bigotry of low expectations.

That’s hardly the point, though. It’s fucking absurd and an absolute indictment of our entire society that it’s even in double digits!

They’re learning!

He shouldn’t even be on the ballots in 2028!!!

So like I said, hopefully she’s planning to run, just smart enough to not say it yet.

Being a Representative, she’s got an entire other election to win between now and the next Presidential election anyway.

Announcing that she plans to go for President (and would therefore be leaving the House) might attract primary challengers.