

I’m sure they share the blame, but ‘fool and his money’ as the saying goes. Picking single stocks is inherently risky, even more so IPOs. This is not financial advice, but only the most thoroughly informed should risk picking individual stocks.
This is a secondary account that sees the most usage. My first account is listed below. The main will have a list of all the accounts that I use.
Garbage: Purple quickly jumps candle over whispering galaxy banana chair flute rocks.


I’m sure they share the blame, but ‘fool and his money’ as the saying goes. Picking single stocks is inherently risky, even more so IPOs. This is not financial advice, but only the most thoroughly informed should risk picking individual stocks.


That takes guts, Major Jason Watson.


This is good news. I hope it isn’t too late for change on a national scale.


Incredble! A glimmer of hope.


A HUGE number of Americans are functionally illiterate.


I shed no tears.
A single person used AI to help write a port for macOS. It’s not exactly a community effort even though the developer bills it as such. It’s unofficial and unaffiliated with the project.


It’s useful because that word means the corruption will be accepted and nothing will be done.


I would definitely trust this person with the nuclear launch codes.


We know.


Never. If it’s worth dying for, it’s worth being homeless.


This is what I call junk open source. They use the open source label, but it’s not really open source in spirit. The license is restrictive and I’d recommend against using any such software in favor of something that’s actually, properly open source. If you’re bothering to self host, I feel like this freedom is important to most users.
Also, I think this is an advertisement and should be removed.


I can’t do that because it’s real. I just waded into that cesspool of a site to verify for myself.


Careful. Idaho Republicans could be into it.


Clearly, this is the most important issue impacting your typical working American family today.


It alarms me, and I’m but a poor layman.


Definitely share your initial concern. Without strong review processes to ensure that every line of code follows the intent of the human developer, there’s no way of knowing what exactly is in there and the implications for the human users. And I’m not just talking about bugs.
They say it’s reviewed, but the temptation to blindly trust is there. In this case, developer appears to have taken some care.
The code was written by Cursor and Claude, but reviewed and heavily tested over 2-3 weeks by me. I created comparison documents, went through all queries multiple times and reviewed the logic over and over again. I also did load tests and manual regression tests, which took lots of evenings.
Let us hope so. Handle with care to ensure responsibility is not offloaded to a machine instead of a person.


Funny thing is, this whole democracy thing was supposed to have been a compromise so we didn’t have royals get their heads chopped off so frequently.


No, that’s the ruling class. They are not subject to laws.
I thought it was a donation. You’d have to be a special brand of fool to consider it an investment, a real cut above those who would intentionally donate their hard earned money to a billionaire.
Ahh, wait a moment. I see.