Trump isn’t the problem. His rhetoric is. Giving him a a figurehead position just hands him a megaphone to spout more of it.
Trump isn’t the problem. His rhetoric is. Giving him a a figurehead position just hands him a megaphone to spout more of it.
Um no, laat year progressives were saying the same thing they are today, the Israelis have been bombing Palestine for over a year.
We differ on a salient point I think. You view progressives as radicals.
I don’t think what the progressive wing of the party are asking for is radical. Neither does the article I posted.
I need to get better at reading usernames
Oh, no. I was referencing the Overton window in general. Not voter turnout as a function of conservatism vs liberalism vs progressivism.
Here’s a quick article that will give some jumping off points for further research.
https://brockpress.com/the-overton-window-on-media-criticism-is-not-as-wide-as-it-needs-to-be/
This is my understanding of the problem as well. Moderate dems are selling the party to billionaires
Ah, sorry. I thought you were referring to election reform or presidential messaging. Yes, Dems in Congress have been a slight net positive.
It’s a well regarded theory in political science. It also is present in many other democracies, look at Germany or Sweden for a current example.
Buying power and income disparity are at the same levels they were 80-90 years ago.
https://www.vox.com/first-person/2019/4/1/18286084/gilded-age-income-inequality-robber-baron
Americans support “progressive” policy when it’s not framed as a political question.
https://time.com/6990721/us-politics-polarization-myth/
Lastly, you think Americans were more progressive on average 90 years ago?
Low voter turnout is a voter access and apathy issue. Disenfranchised voters tend to not vote and that’s a platform and outreach issue for the DNC. Low voter access is shit that elected dems should put first and foremost in their agenda once elected, but only Abrams and Sanders have talked about election reform since Carter was president.
They didn’t do much to stop it
And what have they done to stop it?
There’s a theory called the Overton Window and Dems moving to the center has shifted this whole country to the right. We lost abortion rights because of it and our election integrity and voter access is at risk because of it.
If you want to look at a winning strategy that directly refutes your point look at FDR.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_of_Franklin_D._Roosevelt,_third_and_fourth_terms
In my humble opinion the point of self hosting an LLM is so that the data doesn’t leave your LAN.
I’d encourage Johnson to recess in the affected areas then.
I bought moon reader 7 years ago and still use it.
If you look at national polls at the macro level, Americans agree more often than not.
It’s these “culture wars” that divide us, because if we realized that we control the means of production and there was a general strike of even just 30% of the population this economy would grind to a halt. However Fox News, Breitbart and the rest need us to argue about mustard suits or gas stoves to distract us.
It’s as complex as you make it, is linux native, is scriptable, doesn’t use YAML, is native to the OS, and is free as in beer. Just like SNMP. however they’ll also get logs at a central server they can drill into if needed.
Which I believe fulfills the requirements of OPs post.
Sidenote, self-hosting is absolutely overkill just as a theory and process. I often read responses to suggestions as this or that is overkill, or complicated, or non-trivial effort.
The self hosting community is a broad spectrum of users , from those with home labs on an old dying laptop to those with a full rack setup. People have different needs and interests. Some are learning infra and devops for work or to get into a new job. Some are privacy minded. Some are trying to get the most bang for their buck. Some just want to pay for a cloud hosted solution. Some just want an automated home. Some run a home business.
Edit: to the point of your valid and helpful SNMP post, most syslog servers also will ingest and report on SNMP traffic as well. The container I linked does exactly that. If they find they want to automate processes in the future they can also trigger on the syslog stream as well. But that complexity is only there if they want it. Otherwise it’s just a stream they can parse and trigger an alert, just like SNMP. So OP could have an extensible solution if they want to expand. Also Grafana/Prometheus will take in syslog natively with a couple standard YAML configs if they choose that they want to look at that solution again in the future.
/Rant
Edit: found better resources
https://linuxhandbook.com/syslog-guide/
https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-syslog-ng
That should be a good place to start. Syslog will do what you want.
Proxmox also can run on ZFS, has support to run containers, and can also manage backups.
Mega donors don’t want anti fascist rhetoric because it cuts into the profit margins