Occam’s Razor time, he doesn’t have to do anything because we are on the downslope of the inflation. He just has to sit there and tweet for a year, then claim credit. And the same low information voters who said it was Biden’s fault bread went from $2 to $5, will praise his economic prowess.
Ha, yeah. I’ve been a registered Democrat since I was 18. No freaking way they tried at something so hard like that.
Another problem is their definition of outsider. A rich, corporate douchebag is not.
Wow. Clowns like this should not be in charge of anything.
Yeah. All he had to do was ask him who won the last election and watch him melt down. That was it. Instead he told us how he “defeated Medicare.” We’re screwed.
That is a great idea. I’m in.
I think I have a favorite supreme court justice.
What a message to send to state legislators and mapmakers about racial gerrymandering. For reasons I’ve addressed, those actors will often have an incentive to use race as a proxy to achieve partisan ends. See supra, at 20–22. And occasionally they might want to straight-up suppress the electoral influence of minority voters. See Cooper, 581 U. S., at 319, n. 15. Go right ahead, this Court says to States today. Go ahead, though you have no recognized justification for using race, such as to comply with statutes ensuring equal voting rights. Go ahead, though you are (at best) using race as a short-cut to bring about partisan gains—to elect more Republicans in one case, more Democrats in another. It will be easy enough to cover your tracks in the end: Just raise a “possibility” of non-race-based decision-making, and it will be “dispositive.” Ante, at 16. And so this “odious” practice of sorting citizens, built on racial generalizations and exploiting racial divisions, will continue. Shaw, 509 U. S., at 643. In the electoral sphere especially, where “ugly patterns of pervasive racial discrimination” have so long governed, we should demand better—of ourselves, of our political representatives, and most of all of this Court. Id., at 639. Respectfully, I dissent.
I would encourage everyone to read her whole dissent.
That’s what pisses me off about Colorado kicking him off the ballot. No shit it got overturned. Ballots and whatnot were probably already printed (not from CO btw). It’s not that they don’t have a case… they most certainly do. They had 3 years, and they wait until a couple months before the primary? At that point, it is interference.
Some poor excuse for journalism is better than anything fox news ever has to say. The time where they had any credibility at all has long since passed. At least those Twitter posts are real…
Easy. They need Jesus.
That’s not a debate. Why even have them together? These piss poor excuses for a “debate” are already: take your questions, give your talking points and go home. Let them press each other on shit, not water it down even more.
Turn tables and stuff.
Trump would go down in the history books as a net good.
_cnt0’s Razor.
Oprah Winfrey!
Trumps ideas are not his own. He is parroting putin., kim and who knows who else.
Oh … OH… I know this one, pick me!
I was actually quoting a buddy of mine. That was his reasoning:
You have to love those GOP talking points. State some facts, then intentionally come to all the wrong conclusions. World class whiners.