3·
6 days agoYep. As always: Hope for the best. Prepare for the worst.
- 0 Posts
- 222 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 18th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Trump goes BALLISTIC and ERUPTS as he is SLAMMED from behind by dems
It sucks knowing we’re probably past the age of non-sensationalist headlines
I’m confused, it’s the same article, and it’s not new. What am I missing?
It was filed two years ago and the article hasn’t been updated, what is noteworthy?
What do you mean I see constantly in the news that he’s getting SLAMMED and dems are going BALLISTIC
What do you mean I heard someone was SLAMMED for this
Effected
Props to using the actual verbiage of those who voted for this while wondering where their SNAP benefits went
Certainly true to an extent, but I’d argue the biggest supporters of dark enlightenment only see technocracy as a stepping stone and are trying everything to get to the end goal. They don’t want people to be voted into power based on their tech background, they want power exclusively and without challenge.
Musk in the White House, big balls in our tax systems, etc, was all supposed to hop the accelerationism train towards technocracy until it was clear that years and years of paper and software systems spread across thousands of employees are wildly complex and you can’t just throw an alt-right Ivy League grad with unlimited copilot credits to solve the problem.
The US is the most obvious example though, as you mentioned, multiple countries are trying that slow creep into technocracy, but I still see that as blowing money into governments for the super rich in the tech sector getting the power they are craving.
Funny enough in a true technocracy you’d never have musk, bezos, cook, etc in power. They aren’t nearly as smart as the people they employ. But those people who would be in power generally don’t give a fuck about others. They’re the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun of today’s age. They’d pursue their goals regardless of outcome, because technological advancement is all that matters to them
I mean, the point now is just the end of your comment
pay a corporation
The super rich are trying to collapse governments and turn society into religio-corpo-city-states where they can be neofeudalist kings where their family line maintains through history no matter how technology changes. No different than kingdoms of the past where it’s mostly suffering combined with war, except they’ve convinced crypto bros and other idiots that they’d be knights in this system and are spending boatloads of money to achieve their goals.
Unfortunately what’s been shown in the past is the less resources the IRS has, the more likely they are to just go after the smallest issues, they can automate and garnish wages on people who don’t have the resources to fight it. Then they just avoid the rich because they don’t have the resources to go up against well paid tax attorneys
Bet you they all have amazing parents too
Well at least now we know the price of opening an airbase in the US for non-NATO countries
If there is an election and we don’t go to war just to enact wartime policies to “postpone” it
As per the article she didn’t write it, it’s just some shitty meme that’s being circulated and re-shared by MAGAts. It probably originated in an FSB meme farm to keep churning out destabilizing messaging and pumping the big social media networks with it. Gotta keep people blind and angry so they keep cheering even when they are ones finally pulled into a van off the street and never seen again.
Saved you a click
The wording appears to have circulated widely on Facebook as a viral chain, rather than being an original post by Walters-Sanford, who did not indicate whom she was referring to.
Full Text of image she shared:
People lack accountability, then say, “You could’ve talked to me.” No, I couldn’t. You don’t listen. You deflect. You twist everything into an attack and then play the victim. Conversations with you aren’t healing-they’re exhausting, draining, and emotionally suffocating. Every time I try to speak, it feels like walking through a maze of blame where my words are used against me, my intentions questioned, and my emotions invalidated. I end up questioning myself, doubting my own perceptions, because nothing I say lands without being turned into some justification for your behavior.
I’ve spent too long bending, softening, and framing my words to fit the narrative you want, hoping for connection, for understanding, for a simple acknowledgment of reality. But it never comes. Instead, there’s defensiveness, twisting, and manipulation, all while you act like the wronged party. And honestly, I can’t-and | won’t-invest my emotional energy in someone who consistently prioritizes winning over understanding, control over empathy, and excuses over responsibility.
Is consternation the same as being slammed
And John Oliver as Chief of Staff
Well, there are checks being written behind closed doors and vast changes to financial balances
Yeah but imagine voting for a black woman. The dem candidate could have promised them wild subsidies the likes the they never dreamed, but if it was “sleepy joe” or any other minority they disliked they still would have chosen Trump
Yes but have you considered
$607 million in 2025 accounting for inflation
One reason this sucks so much is people say shit like this at crypto conferences and mean it as a compliment