No, it doesn’t. The US currently bans all communists from applying to be citizens or have long term visas. That has been held as constitutional for pretty much 80 years.

Since the US allowed that discrimination in place without any popular uprising, this new restriction would entirely be allowed and encouraged by the American public.

Only took him 3 years of constant pressure from his constituents and more than 10 years now from leftists to finally be slightly anti-zionist.

Crocodile Dundee.

The list of people currently against the owners of the US is much smaller than the list of democrats that support the republicans. Over 88% of congress is controlled by AIPAC; including many ‘progressives’ Like Hakem Jefferies. Voting them in makes absolutely zero difference in most things; especially when it comes to whatever the owners of the US want.

That being said vote if you want to, but know you can’t get out of a fascist empire by voting.

Democrats have no actual problems with anything Republicans have done or are doing.

They have problems with how Republicans have done these things. The problem with Donald Trump, from the DNC’s point of view, is that he is crass, rash, and not secretive enough.

If he had just kept the concentration camps a secret, like Obama did, they’d be fine with it. If Trump waited to find a better casus belli against Iran, like Biden was waiting on, then they’d be fine with it. If Trump had just couched his privatization of the VA and CDC in flowery language like Obama did with the ACA, they’d be fine with it. And let’s be honest, dems love spying on American citizens; so much they have positively voted on every single bill that has given any government agency that power.

Which isn’t surprising – the parties are not exactly that different; they’re owned and controlled by the. same. people.

The entirety of the global south, including but not limited to:

Mexico, Panama, Venezuela, Ecuador, Brazil, Chile, Argentina, Every native american nation, The entirety of all modern states of Africa, Afghanistan Iraq, Iran, Syria, The Philippines, China, Indonesia…

One can assume they’re drawing from current material conditions, and not meaning to disparage the theoretical platonic form of ‘laws;’ specifically the fact that it doesn’t matter which country you pick (with few exceptions that do try their best), under capitalism those with capital statistically make the laws, and specifically make them to bind the working class while not expecting them to ever affect themselves.

Now one could argue all laws that could possibly exist do this to some extent. And some people would think you’re correct, but realistically the word society is synonymous with rules, which itself is synonymous with laws, so no one seriously believes that any group of more than one person would exist without some level of legality; though that last line itself is incredibly contentious given the hang up some people have on 'if there are laws then surely there must be a state to enact and enforce them – and to those people I say actually read your literature, either anarchism or communism.

Donald Trump violently raped his ex-wife because his hair plugs hurt. She was bruised for days, according to her book.

He saw no jail time. Not even a charge.

Not one Epstein Client has seen jail time.

The vast majority of cases against the Affluent fail to secure jail time, if they’re even brought at all.

In many cases it is not that the laws are written in a way that precludes prosecution, however they are written in a way knowing it is unlikely to ever bring prosecution against those in the Epstein class.

Well yes, actually. There’s data from the 1400s that abstinence isn’t sex education and results in higher teen pregnancy rates.

If the goal was ever to stop teen pregnancy they’d just encourage porn use among teens and free condoms in any third space they congregate.

No. The democratic party had 75 million votes.

Not the candidate.

Not one single living self aware human being supported Harris running. Harris didn’t even support Harris running hence why she showed up sloppy drunk to almost press conference.

She was literally one of the worst possible options.

Not really no. Every other human on the planet was equally as likely to be president as Harris, and they all put in about as much effort as Harris and the DNC did.

deleted by creator