I think it’s even more child-brain than that. Jack smith was special counsel and he is trying to discredit the concept (of special counsel) itself.

I agree, but since it does matter let’s keep these stories coming until it doesn’t!

It’s a very accurate metaphor really. The third rail is deadly and is also the one that powers the train.

So is money free speech or not?

(Yes, I know, the real answer is it depends on whose money and how much of it is in the unmarked envelope)

The party wants a “Joe Rogan of the left” so they can focus on controlling one person to drag millions of people along into whatever fresh hell their billionaire donors are cooking up. Just like the Joe Rogan of the right.

I do not want there to be a Joe Rogan of the left.

“Happy MLK day to all the radical left lunatics who hate our country and its BEAUTIFUL legacy blah blah blah”

Corrupt oligarch says what?

The moment it becomes clear it’s going to pass, even a complete moron knows they shouldn’t be a “no” in the voting record. If there’s even a small chance of scattered shitstorms, that’s a risk with no upside.

Just start a shitcoin

tldr “we” stopped calling them weird because it was actually working and democrats are allergic to winning. sample as that.

In other words: “controlled opposition”

Did you mean adjudicated rapist Donald Trump, the convicted felon and long time friend of Jeffrey Epstein? That Trump?

Is this “the storm” the Qult has been promising us?

Even if he has MS13 tattoos and a real legit MS13 membership card, I don’t care - we [are supposed to] have “freedom of association” here, meaning that membership in an organization alone should not be a crime.

You would think he’d know from his aunt Rosie’s tragic example about how our society puts inconvenient people out of sight.

One easy example: get ready to pay a lot more for vanilla. Madagascar makes 50% of it, and gets a 47% tariff. Good luck picking up the slack with US domestic production.

Ok let’s suppose you could though. Wouldn’t that make it EVEN MORE criminally negligent to discuss classified info there?

It’s a valid thing we should have done a while ago, but can the president actually just do it? I mean, I know he “can” if people let him but, like, doesn’t that in theory require an act of Congress?

Or he wants to go finish melting the rest of the ice faster

I’d vote for “unrelenting cunt but for the people”

That’s a funny way to spell “pardon from Trump”