Exactly. The Primary process is about getting your policies in the platform as much as it is getting you candidate(s) the nomination. She should run, a “standard neoliberal” should run, a corporatist should run etc… the process is allowed to be messy.
- 21 Posts
- 127 Comments
She also ran an incredibly poor campaign (Not completely her fault). Assuming she would have a run a Biden free open (which I’m not convinced of given how poorly she did in 2020), she would have done so by being good at campaigning and testing which messages swayed the electorate. Every winning canadite gets it.
Additionally the people you beat, give you a feel for the parts of the party that you need to bring into the coalition which you can satisfy as you build out your proposed VP and Cabinet. Think of how Obama brought in Clinton as Sec of State, Trump brought in Pence as VP to satisfy the religious right, how Biden brought in Harris etc… Harris didn’t have any of that feedback and picked a pretty questionable VP as a result.
At the end of the day she lost by 1.5% of the popular vote. And I got to imagine that the whole process lost her significantly more than that.
Actually they stopped claiming that during the Bernie-Hillary primaries. It’s part of why the candidates
Losing the nomination would not be the end for AOC. But as a champion for the “Democratic Socialist” wind of the Democrats there’s really not a better candidate to speak at the primaries and ensure that even in a primary loss the eventual winner adds parts their goals to the administrations goals.
This is why the “Christian Conservatives” always run a few candidates in the Republican party, and why they’ve always got a spot in the Republican party platform.
She should absolutely run. I don’t know if she should win the nomination, but running brings a voice to the wing of the party she represents.
Primaries are about coalition building. And to have your ideas represented by the eventual candidate you need a champion to promote them in the process.
mwguy@infosec.pubto
politics @lemmy.world•Elon Musk's drug use was "far more serious" than previously known: NYT report
9·11 months agoWasn’t he openly bragging about regular use of Ketamine a few years ago?
I thought him (and the entire SV “tech bro” scene for that matter) being in drugs was an open secret?
mwguy@infosec.pubOPto
politics @lemmy.world•Part I: Democrats' risk-aversion helped to re-elect Trump
42·1 year agoWhat image?
mwguy@infosec.pubto
politics @lemmy.world•Elon Musk is pissing off everyone on Trump’s team
3·1 year agoThat specific precedent likely doesn’t exist as most new cabinet level positions aren’t created by President Elects.
mwguy@infosec.pubto
politics @lemmy.world•Elon Musk is pissing off everyone on Trump’s team
7·1 year agoHistorically the Logan act has been interpreted to not include the Presiden-Elect and their incoming administration.
If the things mentioned this is the most “normal”.
mwguy@infosec.pubto
politics @lemmy.world•Muslims who voted for Trump upset by his pro-Israel cabinet picks
1·1 year agoI mean is that false? The alternative is siding with a group that literally has a toddler hostage rn.
mwguy@infosec.pubOPto
politics @lemmy.world•Why you should mostly ignore "internal polls"English
2·1 year agoI think it’s this guy. Don’t quote me, but I think he’s Trump’s internal pollster guy. Apparently him an his outfit released a lot of polls that favored Trump and normally polls are released somewhat strategically (in Nate Silver’s experience) rather than wholesale.
mwguy@infosec.pubto
politics @lemmy.world•'Shaken': Analyst claims John Roberts has been left reeling from immunity ruling backlash
14·1 year agoNixon was explicitly pardoned to avoid prosecution for his crimes.
Congress didn’t have to stop the impeachment of Nixon. They chose too because Nixon agreed to never run for office again.
If we want that to change we need an Amendment that established an Independent, non-partisan Prosecutor whose job it is to prosecute Presidents and former Presidents.
mwguy@infosec.pubto
politics @lemmy.world•'Shaken': Analyst claims John Roberts has been left reeling from immunity ruling backlash
13·1 year agoImpeachment is a political process with the ultimate result being removal from office.
And potentially the removal of that person’s ability to ever run for office again.
Impeachment and removal from office does not mean they would go to jail, it is not a criminal trial.
Yes, that’s the design. Because it’s not an “impartial” process but a political one. And because only 40 or so people have been given that protection, it makes perfect sense.
That’s an 8th grade understanding of the concept where you never learned anything after.
The 8th grade understanding is the correct one. As confirmed by SCOTUS.
Remember the DOJ reports to the President. A process where you’re either suppose to investigate your boss or investigate your Boss’s political allies/opponents would be way to open for abuse.
Trump can be prosecuted for what he did before the Presidency (as is being done in New York) and for what he has and will do after the Presidency (should he run back J6 part deuce). But for crimes committed while President impeachment is counterbalance.
mwguy@infosec.pubto
politics @lemmy.world•'Shaken': Analyst claims John Roberts has been left reeling from immunity ruling backlash
15·1 year agoThat is the correct interpretation of the law. We could punish the Seal Team and their chain if command for following the order. But punishment of Biden himself would require him to be impeached.
And frankly that’s how it should be.
Obama killed that 16 year old in Yemen. He isn’t liable for that. Bush spied on Millions of Americans without warrants he isn’t liable for that. You can argue they should be; but that’s not how our system is designed.
mwguy@infosec.pubto
politics @lemmy.world•'Shaken': Analyst claims John Roberts has been left reeling from immunity ruling backlash
15·1 year agoBecause every 8th grade civics course says the same thing. You punish Presidents with impeachment.
mwguy@infosec.pubto
politics @lemmy.world•Major papers are giving Trump’s Jan. 6 indictment dramatically less attention than they did Clinton’s server
1·1 year agoIt should be. But it’s not. Dems needed to follow the Nixon playbook and have a long drawn out impeachment hearing. They punted on that and let him walk.
Trump already beat the charges.
mwguy@infosec.pubto
politics @lemmy.world•Major papers are giving Trump’s Jan. 6 indictment dramatically less attention than they did Clinton’s server
1·1 year agoYes. As much as I hate it. It’s not that big of a story. Either you know and realize Trump tried to commit a coup or you’ve bought the lie.
Until Dems start running on, “He he committed a coup” which they gave up on when they punted on his impeachment; it’s not a story.
The conflict makes it a story.
mwguy@infosec.pubto
politics @lemmy.world•Major papers are giving Trump’s Jan. 6 indictment dramatically less attention than they did Clinton’s server
229·1 year agoMaybe because it’s not as big of a story. J6 has been in the papers every other week since it occured.
mwguy@infosec.pubto
politics @lemmy.world•Biden Says Civilians Being Killed on Both Sides in Gaza. The Ratio Is 45 to 1.English
1·2 years agoIs it really surprising that a government that started a war while spending zero dollars on air superiority, zero dollars on artillery, zero dollars on defensive fortifications, zero dollars on civilian bomb shelters, zero dollars on radar and enemy detection and zero dollars on a military college for its officers is losing the war it started with a 45:1 casualty ratio?
If Israel were truly trying to maximize harm in Gaza it could easily be 4500:1.
This is special Olympics vs. Olympics here.












1.5% was her popular vote margin. Hardly some blowout. Maybe instead of scapegoating brown people we look at the legitimate ways in which her campaign should have been better but couldn’t be because of corruption in the DNC. That corruption is correctable.