This guy has a guide for Rpi5, debian, some disk config, docker, nginx,-proxy-manager, immich. Backup/restore… If you like hands on stuff, this is ok I think…
edit, forgot the actual link: https://github.com/TorATB/RPI-Immich/blob/main/Immich on Raspberry PI5 Guide.md
I’m not sure what you’re saying, but if a person worked with saving other peoples lives, then perhaps I could be wrong.
No-one has ever said on their deathbed, “I only wish I worked more”
Preferably something that has a similar flavor - example: male host, muscular, easy to digest. I think that will make the transition easier
Tell me you think your brother is superficial without saying you think he is superficial…
Lucy with her football…
Purelan, lanolin cream. It’s sheep fat. Can’t use it for your hair, but you can use it everywhere else.
The first thing I’ll do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BdrOrwmk78Y
Im pro choice https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmzdkAbu8dY
Not my highest priority https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RxiDZejZFjg
parody… No https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1z4uhxpOnN0
I’m talking about the people going after Trump. Ofcourse you don’t ignore criminal acts, but you would do wisely to focus on the acts that have strong evidence / clear illegal acts.
To me, it looks like they charge him with lots of small things and hope he messes up in the courts to get him on a technicality…
That wont be popular, and looks highly political.
I’m not the one watching legacy media. I’m not the one echoing popular opinions on lemmy. I 'm not the one with a script.
Ok, then. Enlighten me. Why not focus on one strongly evidenced criminal act? Something they know they can prove and will stick him in jail?
Thank you for your thoughtful and good answer. This is exactly what I was joping for. A straightforward unbiased answer.
If I may, I think of Trump like a bumbling fool, snake-oil salesman, con-artist and kind of a dumb-ass. So how can he have done so many things and not have any mess-ups, so big, they create rock solid evidence against him? You only need one serious crime with good evidence for conviction, right? They are talking about 80-90 inditemints (or counts?) Why not just focus on the thing they have evidence for? So they don’t dilute the case, make it straight forward, with evidence and make it stick?
I will repeat my unpopular opinion, but it seems like they are thowing shit against the wall and seeing what sticks…
Wow, people sure don’t like the simple questions. Lol
Yes, I keep getting told this, years ago. So i stopped paying attention to Trump-stuff, that’s why i’m asking…
I had to google it… “You disingenuously frame your conversation as a sincere request to be enlightened”. I litterally said that I was uninformed/not paying too much attention. I have payed attention in 2016- about 2020. So was wondering if they actualy got him for something now, or not. Sorry for asking… Jeez. Trump sure triggers alot of people…
Russia, “walls are closing in” since 2016?
deleted by creator
Why? I’m trying to add context/add a comment. Who should I properly reply this comment to then? I’m genuinly wondering…
Are they “throwing shit at the wall, and seing what sticks”? Sure looks that way…
“For every blue-collar Democrat we lose in western Pennsylvania, we will pick up two moderate Republicans in the suburbs in Philadelphia, and you can repeat that in Ohio and Illinois and Wisconsin.” -Chuck Schumer, 2016